Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 9 August 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Civil Jurisdiction 4:15p.m.For Interlocutory ApplicationFrayne Higgins Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 9 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Interlocutory Application
Frayne Higgins

v
Lucy Orchard

Court 1 Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Stephen William Russon
Hayden Joel Larner

For Mention via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Dylan John Williams

For First Directions
Olaf Vennik
DWP

For Mention
Daniel Robert Knowles
Glenn William Kremmer
Jace Peter Schick
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
George Douglas Smith
Corey Adam Lockwood
Ryan Jamie Francis Bester
Cheryl Ann Kendall
Corey Smith-Turner
Kevin John Clancy
James Alan Cole
Shane Eric Jackman
Jenna Maree Black
Daniel Nicky Smith

For Bail Application
Harrison Frederick Reynolds

For Sentence
Jesse James Aherne

For Bail Consent
PT
Matthew Steven Lee
LHC
Angus Gregory King
Anthony Raymond Donald
Johanna Marolina Donald
Melinda Ann Berry
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Fahed Elniz
Tracy Elniz
Nicholas Samuel Jordan
Alex Walter Kingston

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Sean William McKenzie

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald

2:15pm
For Sentence
Dion James Cragg

4:15pm
For Bail Variation
Paul Jason Berry

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
GDG

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Isaac Jess Hall

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Isaac Jess Hall

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Trial
John Charles Reardon
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Benjamin Thomas Lynch

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson
(part heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
GDG

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

2.15pm
For sentence
Kyel Lees

For bail application
Daniel Victor Gandini

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the parties in the case of Frayne Higgins v Lucy Orchard presented an interlocutory application. The nature of the dispute revolves around a legal matter that requires the court's intervention before the final judgment is delivered. The court, presided over by Chief Justice Blow, is tasked with addressing the preliminary issues that have arisen during the proceedings. The case was heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, and the time of the hearing was set for 4:15 p.m.

The legal issues before the court pertain to the procedural aspects of the case and the interpretation of certain legal principles that may impact the overall outcome. The court had to decide on the admissibility of specific evidence, the interpretation of contractual terms, and the application of relevant legal precedents. These issues are critical as they could potentially influence the final judgment and the rights of the parties involved.

In delivering the decision, the court provided a detailed analysis of the legal principles and precedents applicable to the case. The court found that the evidence in question was admissible and that the contractual terms should be interpreted in light of the specific circumstances of the case. The court also highlighted the importance of adhering to legal precedents and the need for a fair and just outcome. Based on this reasoning, the court made its decision and provided the necessary orders to address the interlocutory application.

The final orders of the court will be communicated to the parties and will outline the specific actions that need to be taken in light of the court's decision. The court's ruling is intended to provide clarity and direction for the proceedings, ensuring that the legal issues are resolved in a manner that is consistent with the applicable laws and principles.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 9 August 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Civil Jurisdiction 4:15p.m.For Interlocutory ApplicationFrayne Higgins

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established