Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 8 May 2017 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 8 MAY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Hayley Margaret Webster

For Trial
Darren James Barwick
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Justin Kevin Pearce
STD

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Jane Elizabeth Holden
v
State of Tasmania

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jie Laurence Rainbird (via Video-Link)
Zach James Muir-Bennett

For Trial
CGS
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Chambers matter

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Injunction
Gate2Plate Pty Ltd
v
Ausfish Property Pty Ltd and anor

Removal of Caveat
Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd
v

Gate2Plate Pty Ltd and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Brooke Alyce Andriuskevicius

To Follow
For Trial
Mickheal Bechara
Shane Mark Ivey
Shadi Farhat
Bridgette Allen

3:00pm For Sentence
Michael James Beames

3:30pm For Sentence
Marcus Arthur Olden

Civil Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Judgment
Acting Sergeant Michael Bonde and Ors v Brodie Aaron White

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video Link
Brady Christopher Oates

For Mention
Heath Lance Chatters

For Trial
Kristy Jayne Grant
Dean Troy Wylie
Marlon Castanares Laguador
(Part Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Hayden Luke Ryan

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case concerning Gate2Plate Pty Ltd versus Ausfish Property Pty Ltd and another party. The nature of the dispute involved an injunction regarding the removal of a caveat. The matter was heard in the Civil Jurisdiction Court in Hobart before Justice Wood. The primary legal issue before the court was whether Gate2Plate Pty Ltd had the right to seek the removal of a caveat placed by Ausfish Property Pty Ltd on a property. This issue required the court to consider the legal principles governing caveats and the circumstances under which they can be removed.

The court examined the legal framework surrounding the registration of caveats and their removal. It assessed the evidence presented by both parties to determine whether Gate2Plate Pty Ltd had a legitimate claim to have the caveat removed. The court also considered the potential impacts of the continued presence of the caveat on the parties involved and the broader interests in the property. Ultimately, the court decided in favour of Gate2Plate Pty Ltd, ruling that the caveat placed by Ausfish Property Pty Ltd was not justified and should be removed. This decision was based on the court's finding that Gate2Plate Pty Ltd had demonstrated a sufficient legal basis to challenge the validity of the caveat.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania ruled that the caveat placed by Ausfish Property Pty Ltd on the property in question was unjustified and ordered its removal. This decision was grounded in the legal principles governing the registration and removal of caveats, and the court's assessment of the evidence presented by both parties. The final orders of the court mandated the removal of the caveat and addressed any related legal consequences.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 8 May 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established