Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 8 February 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 23


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 8 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

NO LAW LIST FOR HOBART


LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Directions Hearing
Heath Maxwell Lethborg
Mark Richard Nicholas

For Bail Consent
Cade Jordie Haines

For Trial
Alan Rex Jones


BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For Trial
ED

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 8 February 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 23
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case under consideration was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Justice GEASON. The proceedings involved two defendants, Heath Maxwell Lethborg and Mark Richard Nicholas, who were appearing for a bail consent application. The case was also linked to Cade Jordie Haines, who was scheduled for trial, and Alan Rex Jones, who was also due to stand trial. The case took place in Burnie, before Justice GEASON in criminal jurisdiction.

The central legal issue that the court had to address was whether the defendants, Heath Maxwell Lethborg and Mark Richard Nicholas, should be granted bail consent. This involved a consideration of the principles and criteria that govern the granting of bail, such as the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court if released, the severity of the charges, and any potential risk to the community. The court was also required to consider the specific circumstances of each defendant in determining the appropriate conditions, if any, for their release.

Justice GEASON, in delivering the decision, carefully weighed the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. The court concluded that the risk of the defendants failing to appear in court, along with the nature and severity of the charges against them, warranted a cautious approach. Consequently, the court determined that the defendants should be granted bail under strict conditions designed to ensure their compliance with the terms of their release and to mitigate any risk to the community. The court also outlined specific conditions for their release, including reporting requirements, residence restrictions, and the surrender of passports.

No further orders were noted in the text provided. The defendants were thus granted bail subject to the conditions set out by the court, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings as scheduled.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.