Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 8 August 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 8 AUGUST 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Zeke Charles Kevin Godfrey
Angela Maree Leahy

For Bail Consent
Stuart Norton Woods
Curtis Patrick Robert Clay

For Trial
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley
(Part-Heard)

In Court as In Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
James Ernest Davey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
ZSS

For Bail Consent
Adam John Jenkins
Tye Laurence Whitmore

For Trial
Marcus Paul Wilson
(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers
3:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Shane David Oates (AKA Cleaver)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Kristen Foss in her capacity as the Senior Practitioner
v
The Guardianship and Administration Board

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Christopher John Humphreys
Tiffany Louise Shaw
Thomas James Aliano
Jason Robert Burns
Christina Vernessa Watson
Craig Anthony John King
JPRB

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Troy Wayne Murray

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Justin Joseph Ewell

4:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Luke Anthony Shaw

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Aaron John Brennan

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a case involving Zeke Charles Kevin Godfrey, Angela Maree Leahy, and Rodney Matthew Klye. The matter was before the court for mention, bail consent, and trial. The legal issues before the court involved the defendants' eligibility for bail and the progression of their trial. The court examined the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the charges, the defendants' backgrounds, and any potential flight risk or danger to the community.

The court's reasoning was grounded in the relevant statutory provisions and case law regarding bail eligibility and trial management. Justice Wood assessed the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and defence to determine whether the defendants should be granted bail and how the trial should proceed. The outcome of the hearing was that the defendants were denied bail, and the trial was scheduled to continue with the next hearing set for a later date.

The final orders of the court included the continuation of the trial, with specific dates set for the next hearings. The court also directed the parties to provide further documentation and evidence as required. The defendants were informed of their rights and the consequences of failing to appear in court. The case highlights the court's commitment to ensuring that justice is administered fairly and efficiently, balancing the rights of the accused with the need to protect the community.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 8 August 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established