Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 7 September 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 860


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
B G M

10:15 a.m
For Trial
Brett Knox
(Part-heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Lachlan Justin Plummer

11:15 a.m.
For Legal Argument via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jackson Mansfield

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Joshua Michael Murtagh
James Michael Fitzgerald

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
Joshua Dillon Astell
John Saether
Mitchell Anthony Noel Allie
Ty Ferguson
Peter David Leaman
Jason Clifford Gordon
Jake Laurence Ford
Luke Matthew John Chatters
Daniel Joseph Williams
George Mervyn Walsh

For Directions Hearing via video link to Ron Barwick Prison
Taha Afyouni

For Directions Hearing
BDM
Jakob John Plumstead
Shannon Matthew Pursell
Matthew Steven McCulloch
Jemma Rumley-Cantrell
Anmar Ibrahim Elnami
Reginald Thomas Collins
Catherine Fisher
Jye Matthew Lowry
Belinda Elizabeth Dobson
ABM
Christopher John Howard
Hossein Gholami
James Stuart Walker
John Edward Bailey
Shane Michael Brown
Emanette Kristin Leedham
Carl Alexander Haass
RHK
Patrick Simon Bailey
Damian Steven Matthews
Angus James Ford

For Directions Hearing and For Bail Variation
Adrian Michael Flounders

For Bail Consent
Philip Mark Overeem
Wayne James Benjamin
LGB
Connor Richard Cordwell
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
Jack Willem Harris
Daniel Nicky Smith
Bobby Gene Jacobson
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
Jai Craig Nichols
Kain Lewis Cowen
Renee Helene Kelly
Joseph Andrew Tonner
Budde Mitchell Byrne
Mark William Ransley
Kevin John Clancy
Anthony James Hill
Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer
Todd Athol Jackson

11:30am
For Bail Application via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Jake Mark Pearce

For Directions Hearing and For Bail Application
via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Michael John Hopkinson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10.00a.m.
For Assessment of Damages
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial

Matthew Luke Williams
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

4:15p.m.
For Sentence via Video Link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Tamara Jane Drake

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence via Video Link
from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 7 September 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 860
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 860
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case between Brocklands Pty Ltd and Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, concerning an assessment of damages. The matter was heard in the Court at Launceston before Justice Pearce. The plaintiff, Brocklands Pty Ltd, was seeking to recover damages from the defendant, Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The precise nature of the damages or the cause of action was not detailed in the court listing. The court was required to determine the quantum of damages that the plaintiff was entitled to recover from the defendant.

The court was tasked with assessing the evidence presented by both parties and determining the appropriate amount of damages that should be awarded. This involved evaluating the extent of the loss or injury suffered by the plaintiff and the causal relationship between the defendant's actions and the loss. Justice Pearce had to consider the legal principles and precedents relevant to the assessment of damages in the circumstances of the case. The court's decision would provide a resolution to the dispute over the amount of compensation owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

The final orders of the court were not provided in the court listing. The outcome of the case would depend on the evidence presented and the court's interpretation of the law. The decision would establish the financial liability of the defendant towards the plaintiff and potentially set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.