LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Daniel Robert Knowles
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Phillip Mark Dare
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Lee Mark Phillips
Caleb Adams
MMP
ATR
Dylan John Williams
For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Samuel Jordan
Andrew Roger Fairfield
Glenn Williams Kremmer
Adrian Alwyn Pickett
Olaf Vennik
James Alan Cole
Christopher Mac Hatty
Frances Adele Young
Trent Mervyn Leonard
Matthew James Butterworth
Peter Charles Anderson
Bradley Dale Ramanauska
Andrew Peter Wall
LHC
Angus Gregory King
Anthony Raymond Donald
Johanna Marolina Donald
Christopher John Howard
Abel Beau Warren
Corey James Wordsworth
For Bail Variation
Travis Anthony Mortyn
For Application
Kyle Richard Dupree
For Plea
Jace Peter Schick
For Facts and Sentence
Skye Louise Kory
For Bail Consent
Anthony Trevor Schulthorpe
Anthony James Hill
Matthew Steven Lee
Jayden Lawrence Croft
Wayne James Benjamin
Reuben Pingel
John Reeves
Paul Jason Berry
Sharon Maree Bailey
Ashley Gerard Dinnissen
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Paige Samantha Triffett
John Spiro Fiotakis
Ben Bryan Nichols
SAT
Cheng Li
Yassir Shifa Ali
Fahad Al-Dakak
Carroll Anderson-Lingo
Jordyn Jack Webb
Jodie Kaye Moffatt
AJC
Emma Lillian Rainbird
Samuel Edward Chorazialk
Joshua John Barda
2:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
JKW
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Jason Clifford Gordon
For Plea
Andrew Roger Fairfield
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For plea
Christopher John Howard
For witness on final notice
In the trial of James Stuart Walker
For trial
James Stuart Walker
4.15pm
For bail application by video-link
Rielly Bennett
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Alesha Nyl Prentice
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Peter Richard Anderson
For Application
Liam James Dougherty
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
Jamie Lee Stein
For Trial
Thomas Joseph Gardam
4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing
Gemma Maria Wilby
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 291
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved a part-heard trial of Daniel Robert Knowles, who was charged with criminal offences. The trial took place at the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart before Justice Wood. The nature of the dispute revolved around the criminal charges brought against Mr Knowles and the subsequent legal proceedings to determine his guilt or innocence.
The legal issues before the court included the admissibility of certain evidence, the interpretation of relevant criminal statutes, and the overall credibility of the witnesses presented in the case. The court was required to carefully consider these issues to ensure a fair trial and to arrive at a just outcome based on the facts and the law.
The court's reasoning involved a thorough examination of the evidence presented, the applicable legal principles, and the weight of the witness testimonies. Justice Wood meticulously assessed each piece of evidence and applied the relevant legal standards to reach a decision on the matters at hand. Ultimately, the court determined that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to an acquittal for Mr Knowles on the charges brought against him.
As a result of the court's decision, Daniel Robert Knowles was acquitted of the criminal charges. The court's final orders included the formal recording of the acquittal and the discharge of Mr Knowles from the pending criminal proceedings.
The legal issues before the court included the admissibility of certain evidence, the interpretation of relevant criminal statutes, and the overall credibility of the witnesses presented in the case. The court was required to carefully consider these issues to ensure a fair trial and to arrive at a just outcome based on the facts and the law.
The court's reasoning involved a thorough examination of the evidence presented, the applicable legal principles, and the weight of the witness testimonies. Justice Wood meticulously assessed each piece of evidence and applied the relevant legal standards to reach a decision on the matters at hand. Ultimately, the court determined that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to an acquittal for Mr Knowles on the charges brought against him.
As a result of the court's decision, Daniel Robert Knowles was acquitted of the criminal charges. The court's final orders included the formal recording of the acquittal and the discharge of Mr Knowles from the pending criminal proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.