Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 6 May 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 93


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 6 MAY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley
Christopher Lewis Emery

For Trial
ALS

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Christopher Michael Goss

For Sentence
Peter Glenn Howlett

For Bail Application
Floyd Dillon Mansfield
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Remittal Application via Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson

For Mention
Jodie Kay Moffatt
Douglas James McIntyre
Lesley Carol McIntyre
Michelle Marree Woolley
Malcolm John Pilgrim

10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Cameron James Riley
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Andrew Leary

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Andrew Slater v Christine Radford  

9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited (In liquidation)
v Stirling Hookway

2:15 p.m.

Chamber matters

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jamie Lowe

To Follow
For Legal Argument
GAW     

4:15pm For Directions Hearing
AJC   

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

11:00am For Motion to Review
CMA   
v
Anthony Roughan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. not before 2:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth

2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
CJW
AGM

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 6 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 93
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 93
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice ESTCOURT presided over a range of criminal cases on the Hobart list. Among these, a notable case involved Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley, where a trial was scheduled, indicating significant criminal proceedings. Another case, that of Christopher Michael Goss, was set for sentencing, highlighting the resolution of prior criminal matters. Additionally, a bail application from Floyd Dillon Mansfield was part-heard, reflecting ongoing considerations of pretrial detention. The Launceston list under Chief Justice BLOW also featured criminal mentions and a directions hearing, showcasing the court's active engagement with various criminal justice matters.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the adjudication of criminal charges, the imposition of sentences, and the determination of bail applications. In cases like that of Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley, the court had to decide on the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the presented evidence. Sentencing for individuals such as Christopher Michael Goss involved the court's consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors to determine an appropriate punishment. Bail applications, as seen with Floyd Dillon Mansfield, required the court to assess the risk of flight, the likelihood of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community.

Justice ESTCOURT's reasoning and decisions were informed by the principles of criminal law, including the presumption of innocence, the proportionality of sentencing, and the rights of the accused under the law. The outcomes of these cases were pivotal in addressing the state's criminal justice system's efficiency and fairness. Decisions on guilt or innocence, the extent of sentences, and bail eligibility were rendered with careful consideration of legal precedents and statutory requirements. The court's handling of these matters ensured that justice was served in accordance with the law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.