LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 6 MAY 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley
Christopher Lewis Emery
For Trial
ALS
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Christopher Michael Goss
For Sentence
Peter Glenn Howlett
For Bail Application
Floyd Dillon Mansfield
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Remittal Application via Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson
For Mention
Jodie Kay Moffatt
Douglas James McIntyre
Lesley Carol McIntyre
Michelle Marree Woolley
Malcolm John Pilgrim
10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Cameron James Riley
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Andrew Leary
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Andrew Slater v Christine Radford
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited (In liquidation)
v Stirling Hookway
2:15 p.m.
Chamber matters
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jamie Lowe
To Follow
For Legal Argument
GAW
4:15pm For Directions Hearing
AJC
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00am For Motion to Review
CMA
v
Anthony Roughan
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. not before 2:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth
2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
CJW
AGM
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 6 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 93
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 93
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed the adjudication of criminal charges, the imposition of sentences, and the determination of bail applications. In cases like that of Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley, the court had to decide on the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the presented evidence. Sentencing for individuals such as Christopher Michael Goss involved the court's consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors to determine an appropriate punishment. Bail applications, as seen with Floyd Dillon Mansfield, required the court to assess the risk of flight, the likelihood of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community.
Justice ESTCOURT's reasoning and decisions were informed by the principles of criminal law, including the presumption of innocence, the proportionality of sentencing, and the rights of the accused under the law. The outcomes of these cases were pivotal in addressing the state's criminal justice system's efficiency and fairness. Decisions on guilt or innocence, the extent of sentences, and bail eligibility were rendered with careful consideration of legal precedents and statutory requirements. The court's handling of these matters ensured that justice was served in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.