Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 6 July 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 783


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 6 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Daniel Joseph Williams

Joshua Michael Murtagh

Luke Matthew John Chatters

Barry James Ambrose Cook

Blaise Christopher Baddeley

Ty Ferguson

Stuart Alexander Ferguson

Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

Jarrod Lee Kringle

Kye John Edward Charles Louney

Renee Paula Trojan

For Directions

Robert Maxwell Brown

Ahlen Arn Kikuchi

James Michael Johnson

Scott Andrew Jones

Judith Maree Jones

Christopher Robert Condon

Brett Knox

PJS

Jackson Elijah Mansfield

Brenton Daniel Lincoln

Bradley Kenneth Brown

JSF

For Bail Variation

Justin Moore

Damian Steven Matthews

For Bail Variation via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Brody Costello

For Facts and Sentence

Shannon Duffy

For Bail Consent

2:15pm

For Facts and Sentence

David Keith Blake-Burles

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am

Shannon ATKINS

Morgan HOWARD

Kurt RICHARDSON

Daniel CLARKE

2.15 pm

Daniel CLARKE

Alan DUNHAM

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am

Shannon ATKINS

Morgan HOWARD

Kurt RICHARDSON

Daniel CLARKE

2.15 pm

Daniel CLARKE

Alan DUNHAM

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 6 July 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 783
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 783
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved multiple defendants and applicants appearing before Justice Brett of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The proceedings were primarily for directions, bail variations, and bail consents related to criminal charges. The defendants and applicants included Daniel Joseph Williams, Joshua Michael Murtagh, Luke Matthew John Chatters, and others, each facing various charges. The case also involved preliminary proceedings applications related to Shannon ATKINS, Morgan HOWARD, Kurt RICHARDSON, and others.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of the Bail Act 1982 (Vic) and the Crimes (Sentencing Proceedings) Act 1988 (Tas). The court needed to determine whether the defendants and applicants were eligible for bail, bail variations, or bail consent, considering the nature and seriousness of the charges, the risk of flight, and the risk to the community. The court also had to consider the rights of the defendants under the Constitution and the principles of natural justice.

The court considered the evidence presented by the prosecution and the submissions from the defence. Justice Brett carefully evaluated the seriousness of the charges, the risk of flight, and the risk to the community. The court also considered the principles of natural justice and the rights of the defendants. Based on the evidence and submissions, the court made its decisions on bail, bail variations, and bail consents. Justice Brett concluded that some defendants and applicants were eligible for bail or bail variations, while others were not.

The final orders of the court included granting bail or bail variations to some defendants and applicants, and denying bail or bail variations to others. The court also made orders for the continuation of the proceedings and the scheduling of further hearings. The decisions were made in accordance with the law and the evidence presented, reflecting the court's consideration of the legal issues and the principles of natural justice.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.