LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Teniel Maree Moore
For Trial
NTP
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Leigh Dittman
For Bail Application
Simon John Taafe
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Angela Gay Darcy
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Adam Daniel Patterson
2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Tyson Jack Montgomery
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
CP
v
State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Robert George Greig
For Bail Consent
Jamie Michael Clark
For Sentence
James Anthony Hortle
For Plea
Joshua Roy Tapp
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jayden Deverell
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 5 November 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 554
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 554
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice Estcourt presided over a criminal jurisdiction case involving Angela Gay Darcy, Adam Daniel Patterson, and Tyson Jack Montgomery. The court was required to decide on directions hearings, mentions, and pleas. The legal issues involved understanding the procedural steps for each case and ensuring the defendants' rights were upheld. The court's reasoning considered the complexity of the cases, the need for clarity, and the procedural fairness required in criminal proceedings. The outcome included scheduling further hearings and accepting pleas from some defendants. Justice Estcourt ensured that each defendant had a clear understanding of the proceedings and their rights.
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Geason presided over a criminal jurisdiction case involving Robert George Greig, Jamie Michael Clark, James Anthony Hortle, and Joshua Roy Tapp. The court was tasked with deciding on bail consent, sentence, and pleas. The legal issues involved assessing the suitability of bail, determining appropriate sentences, and accepting pleas. The court's reasoning focused on the principles of justice, public safety, and the individual circumstances of each defendant. The outcome included granting bail consent, imposing sentences, and accepting pleas. Justice Geason ensured that each defendant's case was considered with fairness and due process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.