Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 5 June 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 130


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 5 JUNE 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00am
For Hearing
Patrick Simon Mitchell
v
State of Tasmania

Not before 11:00am
For Hearing
SG
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Luke Thomas Cameron Nibbs-Maher

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Further Sentencing Submissions by Video Link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Kayla Maree Hunter

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Further Sentencing Submissions by Video Link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kayla Maree Hunter

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 5 June 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 130
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 130
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of cases on Monday, 5 June 2017, with sessions in both Hobart and Burnie. In Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, the Court of Criminal Appeal was scheduled to hear an appeal from Patrick Simon Mitchell against the State of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the provided text, but it involved an appeal in a criminal matter. Additionally, SG was scheduled to appeal against the State of Tasmania in the same court, though the specifics of SG’s case were also not outlined.

The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal would have pertained to the validity of the proceedings or decisions made in the original trial, focusing on whether there were any errors of law that warranted the appeal being upheld. The Court would have considered arguments from both parties, assessing whether the appeal had merit based on legal principles and precedents. The outcome of these hearings would depend on the Court's interpretation of the evidence and the law as applied to the facts of each case.

Justice Pearce presided over the Court of Criminal Appeal, and Justice Brett handled sentencing for Luke Thomas Cameron Nibbs-Maher and further sentencing submissions for Kayla Maree Hunter. The final orders and decisions would be communicated in written judgments, detailing the Court’s reasoning and conclusions on the appeal and sentencing matters. The Burnie session, handled by Justice Brett, also involved further sentencing submissions for Kayla Maree Hunter, indicating ongoing judicial consideration of her case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.