Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 31 October 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 235


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 31 OCTOBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application
Sean Grant Gleeson

Court 7, Salamanca Place 
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Brodie Self
(Part Heard)

For Bail Consent
Lucas William Gatehouse
Hock Leong Chia
Kaylene Margaret Smith

For Mention
A Witness

For Trial
Aleasha Berenice Sims

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Leigh Feil

For Bail Consent
Aaron William Nash Spong

For Trial
Alexander Gordon Calvert

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
MG

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention via Video-Link
Corey Mitchell Gesler
Christopher John Humphreys

To Follow
For Mention
Conniey Rea-Riley

To Follow
For Bail Consent
PDW

To Follow
For Legal Argument
JWM

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Timothy John Moore v Graham Leslie George
(Personally and in his capacity as

Executor of the Estate of Karlene Gweneth George (Deceased))

BURNIE

No Law List for Burnie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 31 October 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 235
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 235
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of matters on 31 October 2016, across multiple locations and jurisdictions. In the criminal jurisdiction, several bail applications and mentions were scheduled, including applications from Sean Grant Gleeson, Brodie Self, Lucas William Gatehouse, Hock Leong Chia, Kaylene Margaret Smith, Jamie Leigh Feil, and Aaron William Nash Spong. Alexander Gordon Calvert's trial was also listed for the afternoon. The Launceston court had mentions and bail consent applications from Corey Mitchell Gesler, Christopher John Humphreys, and Conniey Rea-Riley. In the civil jurisdiction, Timothy John Moore's case against Graham Leslie George, in his personal capacity and as executor of the estate of Karlene Gweneth George, was set for trial. Burnie did not have any listed matters for the day.

The legal issues presented to the court included determining whether bail should be granted or refused for the applicants, the scheduling and management of ongoing criminal cases, and the resolution of the civil dispute between the parties. The court was tasked with assessing the evidence and arguments presented in each matter to make informed decisions about the next steps in the legal process. This involved considering factors such as the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and the impact on the community.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it is understood that the judges would have considered the specific circumstances of each case, applying relevant legal principles and statutes. Decisions on bail applications would have been based on the balance of convenience test, weighing the interests of the community against the rights of the accused. The outcome of the civil case would have been determined by the merits of the arguments and the evidence presented by both parties.

No final orders were mentioned in the provided excerpt, but it is expected that the court would have made decisions on each matter heard, providing directions for the next steps in the legal process for each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.