LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 3 MAY 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
J S F
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
J L H
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
Ronald Athol Keating
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Allen Michael Prestage and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Michael Thorne and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Scott Francis Howells and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
(Part-heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
KWDF
4:00pm
For Bail Application
Jai Craig Nichols
4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges
For Plea
Bradley Jones
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
For Directions Hearing
Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer
Matthew Steven Lee
MJP
Casey Nicholas Booth
Adam John Munnings
Roderick Leigh Triffett
Anthony Stephen Butcher
MJL
Joseph Andrew Tonner
JSF
Jorden Bird
Shane Christopher Hardman
Daniel Robert Knowles
ACL
ABM
KL
Jace Peter Schick
David Jeffrey Burridge
JAJ
For Bail Consent
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
Patrick Simon Bailey
Peter Stanley Cormie
Matthew Lionel Knowles
DLQ
Jeremy Mark Quinn
ATDS
Ashley Dean Brown
Judd Paul Kraemers
Peter Charles Anderson
Michael Jay Edgerton
Nathan Matthew Harrison
Samuel Edward Chorazialk
George Douglas Smith
For Facts and Sentence
Jarrod Christopher Shaw
For Plea via video-link to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
For Application
Kye Scott James
Re Aaron James Irwin: Application for Forfeiture of Recognisance
For Bail Application via video-link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Ron Barwick Prison
Shayden Aaron Burgess
For Bail Application
Mitchell Andrew Allie
For Mention
ATR
2:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh
3:00p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Kain Lewis Cowen
For Plea
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00
For Mention
Joshua Lee Scott
For Bail Variation
Corey Mitchell Gesler
For Directions Hearing
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler
Witness on Final Notice
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Plea via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
Andrew Stewart Morrison
Zannon Tony Howard
Simon Cole Wigg
For Bail Consent
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
For Trial
Shane Anthony Dyson
(Part-Heard)
10:00 a.m but not before 4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
J S F
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
J L H
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
Ronald Athol Keating
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Ron Barwick Prison
SAB
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case presented to the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved multiple parties and legal issues. The court was tasked with handling various criminal and civil cases, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and trials. Notably, one of the cases was the sentencing of Ronald Athol Keating, which was presided over by Justice WOOD in Hobart. Another significant matter was the trial involving Allen Michael Prestage and others against Melissa Jayne Barrett, which was part-heard in Hobart before Justice BRETT.
The legal issues before the court ranged from determining the appropriate bail conditions for defendants to deciding on the sentence for individuals convicted of crimes. In the case of Ronald Athol Keating, the court needed to consider the severity of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it to determine an appropriate sentence. Similarly, in the trial of Allen Michael Prestage and others, the court had to assess the evidence presented and decide on the guilt or innocence of the defendants.
Justice WOOD, in presiding over the sentencing of Ronald Athol Keating, considered the nature of the offence, Keating's criminal history, and the impact of the crime on the victim. The court found that the sentence should reflect the seriousness of the crime and aim to deter future offences. Justice BRETT, in the trial of Allen Michael Prestage and others, carefully evaluated the evidence and testimonies to arrive at a decision on the guilt of the defendants. The final outcomes of these cases would depend on the specific findings of the court regarding the evidence and the applicable laws.
The final orders of the court would be communicated in due course, detailing the sentences, bail conditions, and any other legal determinations made during the proceedings.
The legal issues before the court ranged from determining the appropriate bail conditions for defendants to deciding on the sentence for individuals convicted of crimes. In the case of Ronald Athol Keating, the court needed to consider the severity of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it to determine an appropriate sentence. Similarly, in the trial of Allen Michael Prestage and others, the court had to assess the evidence presented and decide on the guilt or innocence of the defendants.
Justice WOOD, in presiding over the sentencing of Ronald Athol Keating, considered the nature of the offence, Keating's criminal history, and the impact of the crime on the victim. The court found that the sentence should reflect the seriousness of the crime and aim to deter future offences. Justice BRETT, in the trial of Allen Michael Prestage and others, carefully evaluated the evidence and testimonies to arrive at a decision on the guilt of the defendants. The final outcomes of these cases would depend on the specific findings of the court regarding the evidence and the applicable laws.
The final orders of the court would be communicated in due course, detailing the sentences, bail conditions, and any other legal determinations made during the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.