LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 29 JANUARY 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
James Russon
Not Before 11:30am
For Bail Application
Braydon Hopkinson
Zane Michael Jamieson
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Ziggy Kenneth Hancock-Yost
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 29 January 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 316
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 316
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included assessing the likelihood of Hancock-Yost appearing in court if released on bail, the risk of reoffending, and the impact of bail on the community. The court also considered the principles of proportionality and fairness in determining whether bail should be granted. Evidence presented during the hearing included statements from law enforcement and character references.
Acting Justice Porter carefully weighed the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and defence. The court determined that while Hancock-Yost had a history of offending, there were mitigating factors that suggested a lower risk of reoffending. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to specific conditions, including regular check-ins with a parole officer and restrictions on certain activities. The decision balanced the need for public safety with the presumption of innocence inherent in the bail process.
The final orders of the court stipulated that Hancock-Yost be released on bail with the outlined conditions. The court's decision underscored the importance of a nuanced approach in bail applications, recognising the complexities involved in balancing individual rights with community protection.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.