LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY 28 JUNE 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Criminal Jurisdiction Not before 10:45a.m.For Directions Hearing via video-link to...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 203

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY 28 JUNE 2021


HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Criminal Jurisdiction Not before 10:45a.m.For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison ComplexShayden James Cowen   
Robert Peter Matthewson  
Christopher John Worker  
Oscar Jyles Dyett                   
Jonathon Henry Holmes  
Cameron Scott MacDonald  

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Ron Barwick PrisonAPA   
James Allan Bennett Watts   
Martin Gerard Quigley  

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Hobart Reception PrisonJoshua Edward Peter Darling   
ATR   
SC         
For Directions HearingStephen John Hunt  
Tyler Anthony James Causon     
Justin Andrew Leary  
Clinton Anthony Williams  
Elizabeth Ann Scott  
Emma Lillian Rainbird  
NMH     
Carl Alexander Haas  
Tara Elizabeth Irwin  
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith         
Peter Roy Furminger  
Paige Samantha Triffett  
Kylie Louise Wise  
Luke James Oakley  
GLR  
Andrew Peter Wall  
Zane Christopher Benson  
Beau Warren Abel  
Travis Anthony Mortyn  

For PleaAlex Bresnehan              
DLQ      

For Application Sean William Mckenzie  

For Bail Consent Mark Kyle Sherman
Kevin John Clancy
Andrew Roger Fairfield
Barry Douglas Salter
JAJ                 
Golafrouz Nazari       
John Charles Reardon
Justin David Radcliffe  
Matthew Steven Lee  
Fahad Al-Dakak           
Jason Noel Browning
BDR   

Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Backstop Trial
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Trial
R H K

4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing
J M T
4:15 p.m
For Sentence
Cassandra Helene Murray


Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Emma-Lisa Eronen 

 
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie,
Dion James Cragg


Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For application to vary home detention order
Jake Mark Pearce

For trial
Trent Scott Henricks


Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Extension of Time
Desmond Perce David JENNINGS v Andrew Paul Bryan McCULLAGH

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing
DAP   

For Plea
Marcus John Williams
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Emma-Lisa Eronen 
 
  

BURNIE


Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
MJW  

For Plea
Zannon Tony Howard

For Trial
Alistair Paul Nicholls

For Witness on Final Notice
Clare Mae Lee

4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Dion James Cragg


%MCEPASTEBIN%

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 203
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on Monday, 28 June 2021, concerning various criminal matters. The court sessions involved defendants facing charges such as burglary, drug trafficking, and assault. The cases were presided over by different judges, including Chief Justice BLOW, Justice WOOD, Justice PEARCE, Justice BRETT, and Justice GEASON. The proceedings included directions hearings, bail consent applications, plea hearings, and trials.

The legal issues before the court varied across the cases, focusing on procedural matters, bail applications, and the admissibility of evidence. For instance, some defendants sought variations to their bail conditions or home detention orders, while others faced hearings regarding the admissibility of certain evidence in their trials. The court was tasked with determining whether the applications for bail variations and evidence admissibility met the legal standards set forth in Tasmanian law.

The court provided rulings on each matter, considering the specific circumstances of the cases. For bail variations and home detention orders, the court assessed whether the proposed changes would adequately address the concerns related to public safety and the likelihood of reoffending. In cases involving the admissibility of evidence, the court examined whether the evidence met the criteria for relevance and reliability. The outcomes included granting or denying bail variations, setting conditions for home detention, and making decisions on the admissibility of evidence in the trials.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the outcomes of the hearings. Some defendants were granted variations to their bail conditions or home detention orders, while others had their applications denied. The court also ruled on the admissibility of certain evidence, which would impact the subsequent trials of the defendants. The decisions reflected the court's consideration of the legal principles and the specific facts of each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.