LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 26 JUNE 2017
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m. by video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Bail Application
Carl Maxwell Hall
Curtis De Ruyter
Ivan James Quarrell
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Trent Aaron Gordon
For Mention
A Witness
For Trial
Daniel Jacob Hansen
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Damien D’ettorre
v
The State of Tasmania
Joel Maddox
v
The State of Tasmania
For Directions Hearing
James Anthony Gordon
Ben Bryan Nichols
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Emma May Wordsworth
For Bail Application
Damien Paul Ford
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Stay Action
Nigel Burch
v
Douglas Parkinson and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
CJL
Justin Lee Clark
To Follow
For Trial
Peter Michael Kopper
4:00pm For Bail Application by video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Carl Maxwell Hall
Curtis De Ruyter
Ivan James Quarrell
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Bradley Dean Johnston
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
To Follow
For Trial
Christopher Charles Bond
4:15pm
For Sentence
Shaun Robert Armstrong
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 26 June 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 147
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 147
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court primarily revolved around the granting of bail for the accused, the procedural aspects of trials, and the management of preliminary proceedings. Justice TENNENT had to assess the bail applications, considering the nature and severity of the charges against the applicants, their criminal history, and the likelihood of them appearing in court if released on bail. Similarly, Justice BRETT needed to manage the witness mention and ensure that the trial proceeded smoothly, addressing any logistical or procedural concerns that might arise.
Justice TENNENT, in his evaluation of the bail applications, focused on the risks associated with releasing the accused on bail and weighed these against the applicants' rights to liberty. He considered the gravity of the charges and the potential for reoffending. Justice BRETT managed the mention efficiently, ensuring that all necessary preparations were in place for the trial to proceed without undue delay. The court's decisions were based on a careful consideration of the evidence and legal standards applicable to each case.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania and the Court of Criminal Jurisdiction handled various legal matters, focusing on bail applications, trial preparations, and preliminary proceedings. The outcomes of these cases will depend on the specific merits and circumstances of each individual case, as determined by the respective justices.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.