Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 25 October 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 361


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Ground Rules Hearing
AWK

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jake Paul Killy-Vear Moltoni

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Scott Andrew Cripps
MJE

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
PTM

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial

MJD

4.15pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters

4.15pm
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
JCG                

4.15pm
For Mention
Scott Andrew Francis Jones

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 12:00p.m.
For Ground Rules Hearing via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
SRR                

PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Risdon Prison Complex
Luke Buck
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Trent Mervyn Leonard   
Shaun James Scott  
  
For Directions Hearing
Tyler Anthony James Causon       
Jonathon Henry Holmes  
S C T 
C L 
Y S A 
Andre Charles Lee  
B D 
C W B 
Stephanie Oakford
Lydia Kean  
Jae Mcdermott  
Shane Eastley  
Jayden Laurence Croft  
Myles Brian Franklin  
Corey Adam Lockwood  
James Alan Cole  
M J P 
Craig Michael West
Corey Douglas Lovell                   
 
For First Directions Hearing
Shiralee Anne Dale               
 
For Plea
Harley Daniel Murtagh
 
For Sentencing Submissions
Alec Mcgeary
Brandon James Smith     

For Bail Application
Luke Randall  
 
For Bail Consent
Kyle Dion Power  
Brock Everett  
David Gregory Bannister  
Erin Hay     
Kevin Michael Phillips                 
W J D 
Marcus Alexander Clayton  
Wayne James Benjamin  
 
2:15p.m.
For Sentence
John Charles Reardon



LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Zane Andrew Henderson
Jayde Patrick Burling
Shane Vivian Smith

For Bail Consent
Brody Reginald Costello
Stewart Ashley Martin

10:00am
For Trial
Natalie Maher
(Part heard)

4:15pm
For Sentence
Dylan Maxwell Cocker
Luke Vere Goodyer
Willem Llewelyn Dawkins

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15PM
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
PTM

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Zebb Mathew Waxman
John William Milligan
Ryley Paul Lehman
Mark John Morsillo
Karli Breeze Newitt

For Sentencing Submissions
Megan Jane Dehle

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Daniel Victor Gandini
For Bail Consent
Ashley Richard Stott
Zack Corey Haase
Nathan Jarard Grant

Not before 12:00p.m.
For Ground Rules Hearing via video link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
SRR    

2:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Curtis Peter Reeve

4:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex and PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Luke Buck
v
State of Tasmania

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 25 October 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 361
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 361
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Geasor heard the case of Luke Buck versus the State of Tasmania. The plaintiff sought an order for the defendant to release him on bail. The defendant opposed the plaintiff's application. The court had to decide whether the plaintiff met the criteria for bail as outlined in the Bail Act 1982.

The court considered the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the plaintiff appearing in court if granted bail, and the risk of the plaintiff interfering with witnesses or committing further offences. The court found that the plaintiff met the criteria for bail and ordered his release on bail.

The court determined that the plaintiff had a real prospect of being acquitted, given the evidence presented. The court also found that the plaintiff was not likely to interfere with witnesses or commit further offences if granted bail. The court ordered the plaintiff's release on bail with conditions, including that he reside at a specified address and report to a police station twice a week.

The court also ordered that the plaintiff not contact any witnesses in the case. The plaintiff was released on bail and the case was adjourned to a later date for further directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.