Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday 25 November 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 25 NOVEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link

Jessica Gay Schreiweis

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Steven Craig Murtagh

Michael Linden Dennison

Rodney Gene Crosswell

Taha Afyouni

Michael Leonard Linnell

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Shannon James Duffy

For Directions Hearing

Daniel Robert Griffith

Beau Wayne Kelly

Paul Harold Kennedy Fulton

Derry Thomas Johnston

Gloria Angele Kennedy

RDA

Scott Steven Saxelby

Jack William Evans

Corey Graham Vincent

Bailey John Purdon

Karl Woisetschlager

Aaron James Irwin

Nicholas Aaron Scott

David Raymond Braslin

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

Leigh Brian Cooper

For Plea

Eric Leonard Ungerhofer

Duc Van Nguyen

Jarrod James Cartledge

For Sentencing Submissions

Jackson Maxwell Carn

Dylan Zane Benjamin

Karin Eiley Rubenach

For Directions Hearing and Bail Application

Renee Paula Trojan

For Bail Application

Dwayne Jeffrey Bell

Jake Paul Killy-Vear Moltoni

For Bail Consent

Michael David Maple

Peter John O’Neill

Justin Paul Moore

Jeevan Thiyagarajah

John Edward Bailey

Andrew Gregory Kennedy

Not Before 2:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link

Jemma Rumley-Cantrell

For Plea

James Stephen William Russon

3:30 p.m.

For Application to Review an Order

BPJ

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Trial

Kraig Anthony Dann v

Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 2, Launceston

Belinda Leone Colbran
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing

David William Michaelson

Diane Lee Omant

Amanda Louise White

For Witness on Final Notice

Matthew Royce Cooper

For Trial (part heard)

Terrence James Burn

Ned Phillip Lang

4:15p.m.

For Mention

Benjamin Ronald Stirling

Sean Peter Burk

Daniel Robert Knowles

For Plea

Nathan Leigh Stebbings

For Bail Application

Luke David Buck

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

RUB

(Part-Heard)

Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 am

Grace Lily Trueman (also known as Grace Trueman) v

Rachelle Maria Trueman (also known as Rachelle Abey)

Directions hearing by telephone

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 2, Hobart
Belinda Leone Colbran
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Trial

DJB

(Part-heard)

10:00a.m.
For Trial

Jacob Adam Williams
Marcus John Williams

For Backstop Trial

Billy Galvin Gordon Riley

4:00p.m.
For Sentence

Katrina Gail Chick (Richards)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Appointment as Notary Public

Hugo Aston

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Mention

A Witness

Krishna Kali Brown

For Trial

Quentin Kevin Bob Osborne

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application

Shannon Atkins

David Smith

The case of Grace Lily Trueman (also known as Grace Trueman) versus Rachelle Maria Trueman (also known as Rachelle Abey) was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. This case involved a dispute between the two parties, with the specifics of the dispute not detailed in the document. The matter was heard in the Hobart court before Acting Justice Porter, indicating that it was a civil matter. The case was set for a directions hearing by telephone, suggesting that it was a procedural matter rather than a trial on the merits.

The legal issues before the court were procedural in nature, focusing on the directions hearing and the appropriate course of action for the case. The court had to determine the procedural steps necessary to resolve the dispute between Grace Lily Trueman and Rachelle Maria Trueman. This included deciding on the admissibility of certain evidence, the scheduling of further hearings, and potentially the resolution of jurisdictional issues if they arose.

Acting Justice Porter, who presided over the directions hearing, focused on setting out the procedural path forward. The court likely considered the nature of the claims and defenses, the evidence available, and the potential for a settlement. The outcome of the hearing would have provided a roadmap for the parties to follow in their pursuit of resolution. The final orders would have included a schedule for the next steps, which could involve further evidence submissions, additional hearings, or potentially a trial if the matter could not be resolved through the directions process.

The final orders of the court would have been detailed in the case records and would have outlined the next procedural steps for the case. This could include setting a date for the next hearing, specifying the evidence to be presented, and any other procedural requirements the court deemed necessary to manage the case efficiently. The orders would have been designed to ensure that the case progresses in a fair and timely manner, with both parties having the opportunity to present their case.

Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday 25 November 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established