LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 25 FEBRUARY 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Deena Shantelle-Rose McCall
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The State of Tasmania
v
LD
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link
Wayne William Howlett
Troy Daniel Perry
For Mention
Peter Glenn Howlett
A Witness
Cody Steven Faltusz
For Trial
RJD
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Justin Andrew Leary
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Christopher Michael Goss
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Pre-trial Conference by telephone
Robert Lawrence York and anor
v
Stephen Wilkinson and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Sentence
Codie Ken Fazackerley
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Toby John Della Valle
Shea Alex Gibbling
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Hearing via video link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Deena Shantelle-Rose McCall
(Part-Heard)
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 25 February 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 34
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 34
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were not explicitly stated, but they likely pertained to the ongoing case involving the three defendants. The court would have needed to consider the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both the prosecution and defence, and any relevant legal precedents. The outcome of the hearing was not detailed, but it would have involved decisions on procedural matters or the continuation of the case.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided, but the part-heard nature of the case suggests that the court was in the midst of deliberating on key issues or had already made some decisions that required further exploration. The court would have issued directions for the next steps in the proceedings, which could have included scheduling further hearings or making interim rulings.
If additional orders were made, they would have been communicated to the parties involved. The court's decision would have been documented in the case records, and any significant legal points would have been noted for future reference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.