LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 24 MAY 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not Before 10:30a.m.
BDR
Thomas Phillip Triffett
Floyd Dillon Mansfield
Amanda Louise White
GLR
Jake Paul Killy-Vear Moltoni
10:45a.m.
For Bail Application
Anita Maree Blake
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson
Caleb Adams
Jack Bradley Harvey
For Directions Hearing by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Adam Paul Alexander
MMP
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Tyler Anthony James Causon
For Directions Hearing by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex, Ron Barwick Prison and PWR, Cameron Street, LauncestonZHB
JRB
LEC
JDP
VDS
For Directions Hearing
Andrew Roger Fairfield
David Ian Coles
Daniel Nicky Smith
ART
William Mark Hutchinson
Michael Laurence Sawford
TPB
Joshua James Barda
Peter Stanley Cormie
Wayne James Benjamin
Barrie Linton Arnold
Alex Bresnehan
JKW
Zane Christopher Benson
SHH
Matthew Lionel Knowles
Garry Matthews
Jye Matthew Lowry
For Application to Vary Bail
Ashley Dean Brown
For Plea
Aarif Billah Eldaleh
For Bail Consent
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
Maryann Wall
AJC
PAC
MJP
Bryce Robert Richardson
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Tara Elizabeth Irwin
Kevin John Clancy
DLQ
Fahad Al-Dakak
Joshua George Hector Clark
Annabelle Vanessa Millhouse
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Rad John Pearsall
JAGD
Emily Ruth Brown
Sharon Maree BaileyMarcus Alexander Clayton
Gregory John Hall
Anthony James Hill
James Stuart Walker
Arron David Roots
James Harold Coomer
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 11:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon
Daniel Joseph Williams
For Mention
Lisa Maree Wells
Jake Mark Pearce
For Sentencing Submissions
Cheyenne Margaret McGuire
For Sentence
Joel Peter Young
Rachael Anne Hardy
For Application to Review an Order
Gary James Brodie
For Bail Consent
Jed Curtis Leggett
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Emma-Lisa Eronen
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Brendan Edward Cotter
(Part-heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
4:15p.m.
For Bail Consent
John David Clinton
Matthew Lee Pearce
For Sentence
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
Jarrod Christopher Shaw
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10.00a.m.
For Hearing via Teams
CHAMBER MATTER
LAUNCESTON
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not Before 10:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
VDS
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jacob Alexander Ralph Haworth
For Bail Consent
John Gregory Peck
Stephen Thomas Heath
For Trial
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Kyam Keith Broadby
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 156
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a case involving several defendants. Thomas Phillip Triffett, Floyd Dillon Mansfield, Amanda Louise White, and others faced criminal charges. The court had to address various legal issues, including bail applications and directions hearings. The case was heard before Chief Justice Blow and Justices EST, PEARCE, BRETT, PORTER, and HOLT, amongst others.
The court was tasked with determining the bail applications of several defendants, including Anita Maree Blake, Braydon Leigh Hopkinson, and others. Additionally, the court had to address directions hearings and sentencing submissions for defendants such as Cheyenne Margaret McGuire and Joel Peter Young. The legal issues involved assessing the risk of flight, the danger to the community, and the potential for interference with witnesses.
In its reasoning, the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The court evaluated the circumstances of each defendant, including their criminal history, the nature of the alleged offences, and the likelihood of reoffending. Based on this evaluation, the court made decisions on bail applications and directions hearings. The court also provided guidance on sentencing submissions, ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected and that justice was served.
The final orders of the court included decisions on bail applications, directions hearings, and sentencing submissions. The court granted bail to some defendants while denying bail to others based on the risk assessments. Directions hearings were scheduled to proceed, and sentencing submissions were addressed to ensure a fair and just outcome for all parties involved.
The court was tasked with determining the bail applications of several defendants, including Anita Maree Blake, Braydon Leigh Hopkinson, and others. Additionally, the court had to address directions hearings and sentencing submissions for defendants such as Cheyenne Margaret McGuire and Joel Peter Young. The legal issues involved assessing the risk of flight, the danger to the community, and the potential for interference with witnesses.
In its reasoning, the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The court evaluated the circumstances of each defendant, including their criminal history, the nature of the alleged offences, and the likelihood of reoffending. Based on this evaluation, the court made decisions on bail applications and directions hearings. The court also provided guidance on sentencing submissions, ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected and that justice was served.
The final orders of the court included decisions on bail applications, directions hearings, and sentencing submissions. The court granted bail to some defendants while denying bail to others based on the risk assessments. Directions hearings were scheduled to proceed, and sentencing submissions were addressed to ensure a fair and just outcome for all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.