LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 24 FEBRUARY 2020
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Justine Falviene Manley
Christopher Vernon Clark
Robert Raymond Kaye
Rahn Marcus Hansson
For Plea
Lochlan John Jahnig
For Bail Consent
Matthew Joseph Piggott
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jeffrey Ian Thompson
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Magistrates Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Justin Richard Maynard
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review via video link to
Magistrates Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Senior Constable Luke Venn
v
Daniel John Pettit
12:00 p.m.
For Motion to Review via video link to
Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore
v
Stephen Clement Burton
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
J D
For Directions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Kenneth James Siely
Dylan Roy Bramich
Peter Bill Zawackyj
Joshua Blair Read
Justin Paul Moore
For Directions via video link to Melbourne
Joshua George Hector Clark
For Mention
Shannon James Duffy
For Directions
Christian Niel Shearing
Jesse Wayne Morgan
Stuart Ernest Sinclair
Carl Alexander Haas
Lachlan Justin Plummer
Matthew Stephen Burles
Robert Shannon Devine
Catherine Fisher
Reginald Thomas Collins
I R K
Benjamin John Menzie
Joshua Dion Hill
Shane Michael Brown
Nathan Lee Weschler
Thomas Lee Woolley
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
For Bail Consent
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
Anthony Farnell
Damien Andrew Ferguson
Alan Ross Webster
W S B
Troy Anthony Maher
Jordyn Jack Webb
Benjamin Thomas Harris
Jemma Rumley-Cantrell
Matthew Paul Dodge
For Mention
Joshua Luke Smith
Corey Graham Vincent
2:15pm
For Application to Withdraw Surety Obligations
Nicholas Aaron Scott
Before Associate Justice HOLT
In Chambers
9:20 am
TASCO 1 PTY LTD v RIDLEY CO PTY LTD
Telephone Directions
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Sentence
Jake Douglas Herlihy
10:00a.m.
For Mention
BJHC
Rick Keith Gesler
Joshua Josef Barker
2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Kristy Louise Ackroyd
3:30p.m.
For Bail Application
Wayne Allan Hall-Riley
4:15p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Joshua Phillip Thompson
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Motion to Review via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore
v
Stephen Clement Burton
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Mention
DWW
For Bail Consent
MJW Jason Aaron Lee D’MonteKurt Douglas Horton
Shaun Albert Leonard
To Follow:
For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
(part-heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Oscar Jyles Dyett
For Mention
Alexandre Matafonov
For Directions Hearing
Justin James Browne
Peter Arthur Edward Nibbs
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Shannon Lee Atkins
Daniel Reginald Clarke
Morgan Joel Howard
Kurt Johnhill Richardson
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Shannon Lee Atkins
Morgan Joel Howard
For Directions Hearing and Bail Application
Daniel Reginald Clarke
For Bail Consent
Anthony Leonard Clark
Magistrates Court, BurnieBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Justin Richard Maynard
Magistrates Court, BurnieBefore Justice GEASONCivil Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Constable Luke Venn
v
Daniel Jon Pettit
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
J D
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 82
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Justine Falviene Manley and others involved multiple defendants, each facing various criminal charges. The proceedings included mentions, pleas, bail applications, and directions hearings, taking place in multiple locations, including Hobart and Launceston. The nature of the disputes ranged from criminal charges to bail applications and motions to review. The court was tasked with overseeing these varied proceedings, which involved numerous legal issues including the admissibility of evidence, the granting of bail, and the scheduling of trials.
The legal issues that the court had to address included the interpretation of bail conditions, the admissibility of certain evidence in criminal proceedings, and the scheduling of trials for defendants who had already been committed for trial. For instance, the court had to consider whether the evidence presented was sufficient to uphold charges against the defendants and whether the defendants were likely to appear in court if granted bail. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the bail conditions imposed on certain defendants were appropriate and whether any modifications were necessary.
Justice Estcourt, overseeing the proceedings, provided detailed reasoning for each decision made. For instance, in the matter of Justine Falviene Manley, the court reviewed the evidence presented and considered the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court. The court ultimately decided to remand the defendant in custody pending further proceedings. In the case of Lochlan John Jahnig, the court considered the plea and decided to proceed with the trial, setting a date for the same. Justice Estcourt also addressed the bail applications and directions hearings, providing clear instructions and timelines for each case.
The final orders included remanding certain defendants in custody, setting trial dates, and modifying bail conditions where appropriate. The court ensured that each defendant was aware of the proceedings against them and the consequences of non-compliance. The comprehensive nature of the court's decisions reflects the complexity of the cases and the careful consideration given to each legal issue presented.
The legal issues that the court had to address included the interpretation of bail conditions, the admissibility of certain evidence in criminal proceedings, and the scheduling of trials for defendants who had already been committed for trial. For instance, the court had to consider whether the evidence presented was sufficient to uphold charges against the defendants and whether the defendants were likely to appear in court if granted bail. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the bail conditions imposed on certain defendants were appropriate and whether any modifications were necessary.
Justice Estcourt, overseeing the proceedings, provided detailed reasoning for each decision made. For instance, in the matter of Justine Falviene Manley, the court reviewed the evidence presented and considered the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court. The court ultimately decided to remand the defendant in custody pending further proceedings. In the case of Lochlan John Jahnig, the court considered the plea and decided to proceed with the trial, setting a date for the same. Justice Estcourt also addressed the bail applications and directions hearings, providing clear instructions and timelines for each case.
The final orders included remanding certain defendants in custody, setting trial dates, and modifying bail conditions where appropriate. The court ensured that each defendant was aware of the proceedings against them and the consequences of non-compliance. The comprehensive nature of the court's decisions reflects the complexity of the cases and the careful consideration given to each legal issue presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.