Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 24 February 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 83


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 24 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Justine Falviene Manley
Christopher Vernon Clark
Robert Raymond Kaye
Rahn Marcus Hansson

For Plea
Lochlan John Jahnig

For Bail Consent
Matthew Joseph Piggott

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jeffrey Ian Thompson

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
via video link to
Magistrates Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review via video link to
Magistrates Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Senior Constable Luke Venn
v
Daniel John Pettit
12:00 p.m.
For Motion to Review via video link to
Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore
v
Stephen Clement Burton

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
J D

For Directions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Kenneth James Siely
Dylan Roy Bramich
Peter Bill Zawackyj
Joshua Blair Read
Justin Paul Moore

For Directions via video link to Melbourne
Joshua George Hector Clark

For Mention
Shannon James Duffy

For Directions
Christian Niel Shearing
Jesse Wayne Morgan
Stuart Ernest Sinclair
Carl Alexander Haas
Lachlan Justin Plummer
Matthew Stephen Burles
Robert Shannon Devine
Catherine Fisher
Reginald Thomas Collins
I R K
Benjamin John Menzie
Joshua Dion Hill
Shane Michael Brown
Nathan Lee Weschler
Thomas Lee Woolley
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith

For Bail Consent
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
Anthony Farnell
Damien Andrew Ferguson
Alan Ross Webster
W S B
Troy Anthony Maher
Jordyn Jack Webb
Benjamin Thomas Harris
Jemma Rumley-Cantrell
Matthew Paul Dodge

For Mention
Joshua Luke Smith
Corey Graham Vincent

2:15pm
For Application to Withdraw Surety Obligations
Nicholas Aaron Scott

Before Associate Justice HOLT
In Chambers
9:20 am
TASCO 1 PTY LTD v RIDLEY CO PTY LTD
Telephone Directions

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Sentence
Jake Douglas Herlihy

10:00a.m.
For Mention
BJHC
Rick Keith Gesler
Joshua Josef Barker

2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Kristy Louise Ackroyd

To Follow:
For Facts and Sentence
Joshua Phillip Thompson

3:30p.m.
For Bail Application
Wayne Allan Hall-Riley

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Motion to Review via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore
v
Stephen Clement Burton

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Mention
DWW

For Bail Consent
MJW Jason Aaron Lee D’MonteKurt Douglas Horton
Shaun Albert Leonard
To Follow:
For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
(part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Oscar Jyles Dyett
For Mention
Alexandre Matafonov

For Directions Hearing
Justin James Browne
Peter Arthur Edward Nibbs
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Shannon Lee Atkins
Daniel Reginald Clarke
Morgan Joel Howard
Kurt Johnhill Richardson

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Shannon Lee Atkins
Morgan Joel Howard

For Directions Hearing and Bail Application
Daniel Reginald Clarke

For Bail Consent
Anthony Leonard Clark

Magistrates Court, Burnie
Before Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Justin Richard Maynard
Magistrates Court, BurnieBefore Justice GEASONCivil Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review via video link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Constable Luke Venn
v
Daniel Jon Pettit

Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
J D

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 24 February 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 83
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 83
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Estcourt presided over a range of criminal cases. Among the matters mentioned was the case involving Justine Falviene Manley, Christopher Vernon Clark, Robert Raymond Kaye, and Rahn Marcus Hansson. The legal issues before the court encompassed the consideration of pleas, bail applications, and directions hearings. The court's focus was on determining the appropriate legal procedures and ensuring the due process for each case. The outcomes were tailored to the specific circumstances of each defendant, balancing considerations of public safety, the severity of the alleged offences, and the rights of the accused.

The reasoning employed by the court was methodical, taking into account the principles of criminal law and the rights enshrined in the Australian Constitution. Justice Estcourt emphasized the importance of adhering to legal standards while also considering the welfare of the community and the protection of individual rights. The court's decisions reflected a careful assessment of the evidence presented, the legal arguments made by counsel, and the broader implications of each case. Ultimately, the outcomes were designed to uphold the rule of law and ensure that justice was served in a fair and equitable manner.

Final orders were issued in line with the court's determinations, addressing issues such as plea outcomes, bail conditions, and further directions for the cases. Each order was specific to the circumstances of the individual cases, ensuring that the appropriate legal processes were followed and that the rights of all parties were protected. The decisions made by Justice Estcourt provided clarity and direction for the ongoing proceedings, setting the stage for the next steps in the legal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.