LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 23 MARCH 2020
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
David Edwin Rapson
Brian Francis McKenzie
Nicholas Aaron Paul Cernigoi
Christian Niel Shearing
Carl Alexander Haas
Roger Keith Triffitt
Christopher James Brown
Anthony Farnell
Brett Andrew Imlach
Aaron James Irwin
Johnny David Jones
Mohammad Maleki
Stephen John Hunt
IRK
Timothy David Rainbird
Steven Wayne Oldham
Joshua David Donaghy
Robert Shannon Devine
10:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Kenneth James Siely
James Michael Fitzgerald
Nicholas John Wright
Steven Craig Murtagh
Jake Laurence Ford
Joshua Blair ReadJohnathon Henry HolmesAaron Jacob Wright
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Nicholas Aaron ScottTaha Afyouni
Shayne William Jones
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Hobart Reception Prison
Brendan Lee Jones Kayne Geoffrey Quinn
Tyler Anthony James Causon
To Follow:
For Plea
Ebony-Rose Kelly
Donny Jeremy Ray
For Bail Consent
Talisha Renee Kelly-NarracottHayden Joel LarnerMohammad Reza SadeghiGeorge Mervyn WalshRahn Marcus Hansson
Dylan John Aiden Kemp
John Charles Reardon
Fahad Al-DakakDavid Keith Blake-BurlesJessica Gay Schreiweis
Jayy Scott Tuanh Venables
Hossein KarimiPatrick Simon BaileyMLVT Will Scott Brearley
James Christopher Steven FlaskasChristopher John Worker
Matthew Steven McCullochChantelle Tierre RobertsonCraig John Smith
Jonathon Charles Moran
Rebecca Maree Jones
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie
Jarrad Christian Robaard
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Bail Consent via video-link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Zannon Tony Howard
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Amanda Louise White
(Part-Heard)
For Application
Janelle Kay Smith
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Dean Richards v MBA Finance Pty Ltd
and Steven Tsiakis and Tasmanian Finance Pty Ltd
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Steven Craig Murtagh
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Zack David Devine
For Directions Hearing
Robert Peter Page
Colin Arthur Mitchell
Aaron Charles McShane
Mark Anthony Bell
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Adrian Howard James Hall
For Bail Consent
Joshua George Hector Clark
Joseph Ado Juma
Derry Thomas Johnston
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Krystal Michelle Payne
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Stephen John Edwards
Robert David Edwards
For Directions Hearing via video link to
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Claude James Wigg
For Directions Hearing via video link
Jai Laurence Rainbird
Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.40 am
Pamela Finlayson v Neville Eric Rusher &
Mary Ann Rusher t/as NE & MA Rusher Building
Contractors
Rule 414 directions hearing by telephone
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
10 am
Jacqueline Louise King v Neil Patrick Bigg as personal
representative of the estate of Stephen James Atkinson
Directions hearing
Neil Patrick Bigg & Peter Royston Worrall as personal
representatives of the estate of Stephen James
Atkinson v Jacqueline Louise King
Directions hearing
Carly Waszcsak-Gadd v Neil Patrick Bigg as personal
Representative of the estate of the late Stephen
James Atkinson
Directions hearing
12 midday
Chamber matter
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
JJMH v Acting Sergeant Michael Bonde
Shane Andrew Lee v The State of Tasmania
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Oliver William Clark
Jesse Elijah Hall
Dylan Mark Dennis Jenkins
Leah Jean Woolley
KJE
John Benjamin Adams
Dennis Colin Coleman
4:15p.m.
For Breach Application via Video Link
to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Andrew John Sheals
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stephen John Edwards
Robert David EdwardsBURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jarrad Christian Robaard
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Bail Consent via video-link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Zannon Tony Howard
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Breach Application via Video Link from Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Andrew John Sheals
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Claude James Wigg
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 113
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Chief Justice Blow presided over a criminal directions hearing involving multiple defendants. The defendants, who included David Edwin Rapson, Brian Francis McKenzie, and others, faced various charges and were seeking directions from the court regarding their respective cases. The legal issues before the court involved determining the appropriate course of action for each defendant, including setting trial dates, managing pre-trial procedures, and addressing any procedural issues that might arise.
The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that each defendant's case was managed efficiently and fairly, taking into account the complexity of the charges and the needs of the parties involved. The court considered the evidence presented, the defendants' legal representations, and the overall progress of the cases. Ultimately, the court made several orders to facilitate the smooth progression of the cases, including setting specific dates for trials and pre-trial conferences. These decisions were aimed at ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected and that the judicial process was conducted in an orderly and timely manner.
The final orders included setting specific trial dates for certain defendants, scheduling pre-trial conferences, and providing directives for the management of evidence and witness testimonies. The court also addressed any immediate procedural concerns raised by the defendants' legal teams, ensuring that all parties were aware of their rights and obligations moving forward. This comprehensive approach aimed to streamline the legal process and facilitate a fair trial for all involved.
The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that each defendant's case was managed efficiently and fairly, taking into account the complexity of the charges and the needs of the parties involved. The court considered the evidence presented, the defendants' legal representations, and the overall progress of the cases. Ultimately, the court made several orders to facilitate the smooth progression of the cases, including setting specific dates for trials and pre-trial conferences. These decisions were aimed at ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected and that the judicial process was conducted in an orderly and timely manner.
The final orders included setting specific trial dates for certain defendants, scheduling pre-trial conferences, and providing directives for the management of evidence and witness testimonies. The court also addressed any immediate procedural concerns raised by the defendants' legal teams, ensuring that all parties were aware of their rights and obligations moving forward. This comprehensive approach aimed to streamline the legal process and facilitate a fair trial for all involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.