LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY 23 AUGUST 2021
HOBART
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Russell Peter Haworth
James Alexander Hipworth
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Isaac Jess Hall
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Wayne Vonk
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Marc Russell
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
John Charles Reardon
(part-heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
Darren John COLLINS and anor v DEVONPORT CITY COUNCIL
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Isaac Jess Hall
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 274
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved multiple hearings, each with distinct parties and issues. The first case, Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, was heard in Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart, with Justice ESTCOURT presiding. The second matter involved Isaac Jess Hall, with a mention via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston, also presided over by Justice ESTCOURT. Wayne Vonk faced a bail application in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Acting Justice MARTIN. The case of Marc Russell was heard in Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Acting Justice PORTER, also via video-link from Risdon Prison Complex. John Charles Reardon's trial was part-heard in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Acting Justice MARSHALL. Lastly, Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon's legal argument was heard in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice HOLT. Each case presented unique legal issues pertinent to their respective proceedings.
The court had to address several legal issues across these cases. In the matter involving Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, the court needed to determine the appropriate legal framework and procedural steps for the case. For Isaac Jess Hall, the mention via video link necessitated understanding the logistics and legal implications of remote proceedings. Wayne Vonk's bail application required the court to assess the criteria for granting bail, including the risk of flight and potential danger to the community. Marc Russell's case involved a bail application from Risdon Prison Complex, which meant the court had to consider the specific circumstances of the prisoner and the conditions of detention. John Charles Reardon's trial, which was part-heard, involved the interpretation of evidence and application of criminal law to the facts presented. Lastly, Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon's legal argument required the court to interpret and apply relevant statutes and case law to the arguments presented.
The court's reasoning and outcomes varied across the cases. For Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, Justice ESTCOURT outlined the procedural steps and legal considerations pertinent to the case. For Isaac Jess Hall, the mention via video link was acknowledged, and further instructions were given for the continuation of the proceedings. Wayne Vonk's bail application was denied by Acting Justice MARTIN, based on the risk factors and the likelihood of reoffending. Marc Russell's bail application was also denied by Acting Justice PORTER, considering the seriousness of the charges and the potential danger to the community. John Charles Reardon's trial continued with Acting Justice MARSHALL presiding over the evidence presented. For Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon, Associate Justice HOLT provided a detailed legal interpretation and argument, guiding the proceedings accordingly.
The final orders varied based on the outcomes of each case. For Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, the court set a date for the next hearing and outlined the procedural steps to be followed. Isaac Jess Hall's mention resulted in scheduling a future video link hearing. Wayne Vonk's bail application was denied, and he remained in custody. Marc Russell's bail application was similarly denied. John Charles Reardon's trial continued, with further dates set for the completion of evidence. Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon's legal argument was considered, and the court proceeded with the outlined legal interpretation.
The court had to address several legal issues across these cases. In the matter involving Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, the court needed to determine the appropriate legal framework and procedural steps for the case. For Isaac Jess Hall, the mention via video link necessitated understanding the logistics and legal implications of remote proceedings. Wayne Vonk's bail application required the court to assess the criteria for granting bail, including the risk of flight and potential danger to the community. Marc Russell's case involved a bail application from Risdon Prison Complex, which meant the court had to consider the specific circumstances of the prisoner and the conditions of detention. John Charles Reardon's trial, which was part-heard, involved the interpretation of evidence and application of criminal law to the facts presented. Lastly, Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon's legal argument required the court to interpret and apply relevant statutes and case law to the arguments presented.
The court's reasoning and outcomes varied across the cases. For Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, Justice ESTCOURT outlined the procedural steps and legal considerations pertinent to the case. For Isaac Jess Hall, the mention via video link was acknowledged, and further instructions were given for the continuation of the proceedings. Wayne Vonk's bail application was denied by Acting Justice MARTIN, based on the risk factors and the likelihood of reoffending. Marc Russell's bail application was also denied by Acting Justice PORTER, considering the seriousness of the charges and the potential danger to the community. John Charles Reardon's trial continued with Acting Justice MARSHALL presiding over the evidence presented. For Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon, Associate Justice HOLT provided a detailed legal interpretation and argument, guiding the proceedings accordingly.
The final orders varied based on the outcomes of each case. For Russell Peter Haworth and James Alexander Hipworth, the court set a date for the next hearing and outlined the procedural steps to be followed. Isaac Jess Hall's mention resulted in scheduling a future video link hearing. Wayne Vonk's bail application was denied, and he remained in custody. Marc Russell's bail application was similarly denied. John Charles Reardon's trial continued, with further dates set for the completion of evidence. Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon's legal argument was considered, and the court proceeded with the outlined legal interpretation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.