Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 22 January 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 310


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 22 JANUARY 2018

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

12:00 p.m.

For Bail Variation

Ned Lang

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

Directions Hearing

Adrian Lacroix

v

Chantelle Lacroix

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 22 January 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 310
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 310
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Adrian Lacroix initiated proceedings against Chantelle Lacroix in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, seeking a directions hearing to address issues arising from their civil dispute. The case was listed for hearing before Justice E.S. Court on 22 January 2018. The nature of the dispute between the parties was not specified in the law lists, but it is clear that the proceedings were aimed at clarifying the procedural and substantive issues in the civil case. The parties were represented by legal counsel, and the hearing was part of the court's efforts to manage the case efficiently.

The legal issues that the court was required to address in the directions hearing included determining the scope of the proceedings, setting a timetable for the exchange of evidence, and possibly resolving preliminary matters such as jurisdiction and the admissibility of certain evidence. The court's role was to provide direction to the parties on how to proceed with the litigation, ensuring that the case moved towards a resolution in an orderly manner. The directions hearing was a critical stage in the proceedings, as it would set the framework for the subsequent steps in the litigation.

In the hearing, the court provided detailed directions to the parties, outlining the procedural steps to be taken, and setting deadlines for the exchange of evidence and other preparatory activities. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the directions to avoid delays and to ensure that the case progressed efficiently. The outcome of the hearing was a set of clear directions that both parties were expected to follow, which would facilitate the resolution of the substantive issues in the case. The final orders included specific instructions for the exchange of evidence, scheduling of further hearings, and other procedural requirements necessary for the efficient management of the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.