Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 21 September 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Jodie Kay Moffatt

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jarrad Christian RobaardVincent Di Stefano
Nathan Lee WechslerAlani Povalu MoeakiolaRobert Maxwell Brown
Nicholas Aaron Scott
Ty Ferguson
Jake Laurence Ford
Peter David Leaman

For Directions Hearing via video link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
David Hau Moeakiola

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Emily Ruth Brown

For Directions Hearing
Ryan Edward Brown
Brian Graham Dean Gordon
Carl Alexander Haas
Joshua James Barda
Scott Steven Saxelby
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Stephen John Hunt
Steven Charles Clarkson
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
Christopher Mac Hatty
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Emanette Kristin Leedham
Kenneth John Bailey
Rodney Jeffrey Bailey

For Plea
Reginald Thomas Collins
Catherine Fisher
Wayne James Benjamin
Noah Neptune Weiss-Trew

For Bail Consent
Johnny David Jones
Connor Richard Cordwell
Patrick Simon Bailey
Hossein Karimi
Yohannes Tesfasilassie Tsegazeab
Mohammad Heidari
Mohammad Maleki
Georgia Skrepetos
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
Leigh Geoffrey Barker
RKB
JD
Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Alex Bresnehan

12:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
BWT

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashely Youth Detention Centre
JDP

For Sentence
Luke David Buck

Not Before 2:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Adrian Harris

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing
Colin Arthur Mitchell

For TrialM T S
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing
K L S
Lisa Maree Wells

4:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
T W

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m.For TrialJustin Paul Moore
(Part-heard)

10:00 a.m.For Directions HearingDallas John Eaves
Jarod Lee Kringle

For Directions Hearing and Bail Application
Rebecca Maree Jones
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2Jason Elijah Yammi Mansfield

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey

For Directions Hearing
ABM
Victor Kent Park

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Daniel Victor of the family Gandini
v
Department of Police & Emergency Management
and
Magistrate D Fairley

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Daniel James Crisp

For Backstop Trial
Christopher Ernest Denman

For Trial
Wayne Keith Herlihy

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Damien White and anor
v
Kazmo Pty Ltd as Trustee for Lyndon Family Trust

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved various criminal and civil proceedings. The court heard several directions hearings, bail applications, and trial mentions, with multiple defendants appearing either in person or via video link from various correctional facilities. The cases ranged from minor criminal offences to more serious charges, including drug-related crimes and breaches of bail conditions. The defendants included individuals with a variety of surnames, reflecting the diverse nature of the cases before the court.

The legal issues addressed in these proceedings primarily revolved around the administration of justice, procedural fairness, and the application of bail and sentencing laws. The court had to consider whether the defendants' rights were being upheld during the hearings and whether the correct procedures were being followed. For the criminal cases, the issues included the appropriate management of bail applications and the setting of trial dates. For the civil case, the focus was on the procedural fairness in the handling of the dispute between the Department of Police and Emergency Management and the family Gandin.

The court's reasoning was grounded in the principles of procedural fairness and the efficient administration of justice. In the criminal cases, the judges emphasised the importance of ensuring that defendants were aware of their rights and the procedures being followed. The court also considered the impact of COVID-19 on the ability to conduct hearings and the need for flexibility in scheduling. In the civil case, the judge focused on ensuring that both parties had a fair opportunity to present their cases, despite the challenges posed by the pandemic.

The outcomes of the hearings varied depending on the nature of each case. For some defendants, the court set specific dates for further hearings or trials, while others had their bail conditions modified. The civil case involved directions for the parties to prepare for a future hearing, ensuring that the dispute could be resolved in a timely manner. The court's decisions were aimed at balancing the need for procedural fairness with the practicalities of conducting hearings during a period of significant disruption.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 21 September 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established