Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 21 June 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Civil Jurisdiction 2:15p.m.For Admission to the Legal ProfessionLachlan Campbell...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 194


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 21 JUNE 2021


HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Civil Jurisdiction 2:15p.m.For Admission to the Legal ProfessionLachlan Campbell Thomson
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link to PWR, Cameron Street, LauncestonAWK  


Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Trial
J S F

For Backstop Trial
Anthony Stephen Butcher
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JKW


Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

Not before 11.15am
For directions hearing
David Hau Moeakiola
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Nathan Thomas Charles Howlett
11.15am
For bail consent
John Reeves
HCT
CL
DLQ
ARTDS
Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos
Yohannes Tesfasilassie Tsegazeab
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Hossein Karimi
Andrew James Calvert
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
Lilli Marlene Asprey
PAC
James Stuart Walker

For directions hearing by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Brandon Malcolm Charlesworth       
MMP
Samuel David Pennicott
Mitchell Andrew Allie  
Nathan Scott Booth               

For directions hearing by video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Caleb Adams For directions hearing by video link
Shaun James Scott                 

For directions hearing
Kylie Louise Wise                 
Floyd Dylan Mansfield  
Ryan Jamie Francis Bester    
MJE
Tobias Oddie-Jones               
Joshua James Barda               
MJP
Wayne James Benjamin  
Jye Matthew Lowry               
Kane Douglas Mansell  
Christopher Mac Hatty  
Melinda Ann Berry                

For application to vary home detention order (part-heard)
Jake Mark Pearce                   
For bail application
Lee Mark Phillips                   
Phillip Mark Dare                  

For plea
Maryann Wall            
ADSN



LAUNCESTON
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston Before Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart AWK  

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex, 2
Dane Andrew Clark
For Mention
Glenn William Barnard
For Trial
Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy



BURNIE


Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Alistair Paul Nicholls
MJW
For Trial
Thomas Leslie Rennison

11:00am
For Trial
David Allan Williams
Simon John Dennison
(Part-heard)

4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Kyel Lees

For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JKW

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lachlan Campbell Thomson sought admission to the legal profession. The Supreme Court of Tasmania considered the application and decided whether Mr. Thomson met the requirements for admission as a legal practitioner. The court needed to determine if Mr. Thomson possessed the necessary qualifications, including academic qualifications and practical legal training, and if he was a fit and proper person to be admitted.

The court examined Mr. Thomson's academic qualifications, which included a Bachelor of Laws and a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Tasmania. It also considered his practical legal training, which comprised of a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice and his completion of the compulsory Law Society of Tasmania Practical Legal Training course. Additionally, the court assessed his character and fitness to practise law, taking into account references and other relevant information. After careful consideration, the court found that Mr. Thomson met the requirements for admission.

Based on the evidence presented, the court was satisfied that Mr. Thomson had the necessary academic qualifications and practical legal training. The court also found that he was a fit and proper person to be admitted as a legal practitioner. The court determined that Mr. Thomson was eligible for admission to the legal profession.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania granted Mr. Thomson's application for admission to the legal profession. He was admitted as a legal practitioner in Tasmania.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.