Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 21 December 2020hobart

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1150


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 21 DECEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee v State of Tasmania


For Sentence
M S L


LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST


BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 21 December 2020hobart [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1150
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 1150
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee appeared before Justice Wood in the Supreme Court of Tasmania for a sentence hearing following his conviction on criminal charges. The court convened to determine the appropriate penalty to be imposed on Gee after he was found guilty of multiple offences. The case involved issues concerning the severity and nature of the sentences that could be handed down, considering the circumstances of the crimes and the principles of justice and deterrence.

The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate range of sentences for each offence, the need to balance the principles of retribution, deterrence, and rehabilitation, and the specific circumstances of Gee's criminal history and the nature of the offences committed. The court had to consider various factors, including the impact on victims, the likelihood of reoffending, and the potential for Gee to be rehabilitated.

Justice Wood delivered a detailed analysis of the relevant sentencing principles and the specific facts of the case. The court concluded that Gee's actions warranted a custodial sentence, considering the severity of the crimes and the need to protect the community. After weighing all relevant factors, Justice Wood sentenced Gee to a term of imprisonment, specifying the total duration and any additional conditions or requirements that would apply during and after his incarceration. The court's decision reflected a balanced approach, taking into account the principles of justice, the protection of society, and the potential for Gee's rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.