Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 20 September 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 316


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
William John Christopher McFardzean Foran

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Stephen William Russon
Ryan Jamie Francis Bester
Samuel David Pennicott
Alex Gordon Large
Joshua Dillon Astell

For Directions Hearing
Christopher Alex Lobley
David Gregory Bannister
Matthew Steven Lee
Adrian Michael Flounders
Anthony James Hill
Edward Adam Rolins
Jorden Bird
MJP
Jake Mark Pearce
James Bietman

For Bail Consent Michael Dennis Briers
James Harold Coomer
Arron Roots
Daniel John Ernest Dadson
William Mark Hutchinson
Sebastian Hugo Hartmann
HCT
Rachel Naomi Perri
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Mark Kyle Sherman
Neville Bruce Perryman
Lisa Anne Perryman
Brett Raymond Fenton
PT
Christopher William Blackwell
Tara Elizabeth Irwin
TPB
Christine Leila Lang
Elizabeth Ann Scott
Marcus Alexander Clayton
Gregory John Hall
Lilli Marlene Asprey
Anthony Trevor Sculthorpe
Kyle Dion Power
Melinda Ann Berry
Jessica Justine Dianne Abbott

For Sentence
Kane Douglas Mansell

For Plea
Justin Leary
Justin David Radcliffe

For Application to Vary Bail
Corey Adam Lockwood

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Matthew Robert Smith

For Mention
Carla Elizabeth Thomas
Peter Richard Anderson

For Trial
Benjamin Thomas Lynch
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 am
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Simon Cole Wigg


BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 am
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Simon Cole Wigg

10:00 am
For Directions Heating
John William Milligan

For Trial
JAR

2:15 pm
For Sentencing Submissions
NDT

4:15 pm
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Joshua Kevin Beard
Aaron Raymond McCulloch

For Directions Hearing
Jaqueline Maree Broomhall
Michael John Cowie
Peter Arthur Edwards Nibbs

For Hearing
JSS

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 20 September 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 316
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 316
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a telephone directions hearing for William John Christopher McFardzean Foran. The case involved criminal matters and was scheduled for a hearing in Hobart. Acting Justice Porter dealt with a directions hearing via video-link for James Stephen William Russon and others, who were currently incarcerated at Risdon Prison Complex. The hearing was scheduled in Hobart as well.

The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate course of action for the various defendants. For William John Christopher McFardzean Foran, the court needed to set the directions for his case. For James Stephen William Russon and others, the court had to decide on the next steps for their criminal proceedings, considering their current status as incarcerated individuals. The court was tasked with ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected and that the proceedings adhered to legal standards.

Justice Wood and Acting Justice Porter considered the specific circumstances of each case, including the nature of the charges, the defendants' legal representation, and the current status of their cases. The court provided directions and set timelines for the next steps in the proceedings. The outcome of the hearings ensured that the legal process continued in a manner that was fair and efficient, taking into account the unique challenges posed by the defendants' incarceration.

The final orders included setting specific dates for future hearings and providing detailed directions for the legal teams involved. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to these directions to ensure the timely progression of the cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.