Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 19 June 2017 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 19 JUNE 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Jacob Martin
Simon Catto

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Levi Randy Brett Dobson

For Legal Argument
Heath Lance Chatters

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
MDR
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Trent Wayne Gordon

For Directions Hearing
Martyn John Carpenter
Emma-Jo Alison Mason

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Beven Walker Dwyer

2:15 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Brodie Lincoln French

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing
Tarkine National Coalition Inc.
v
Minister Administering the Mineral Resource Development Act 1995

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
MAIB v PB

10:30 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial

Adam Maxwell Cox

4:00pm via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Sentence
CGS

To Follow
For Bail Application
Troy Shipton

4:30pm For Bail Application
Harley James Wilmot

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jursidiction
9:30am For Formal Return Date via video-link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Craig Andrew Jones v Detective Snr Const Russell Forsyth
Sergeant Lauren Cannell v Andrew Gray

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Debra Willis Sherriff

10:00am
For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness

To Follow
For Plea
Aaron Paul Wilton
Trent Bissett
Shaun Robert Armstrong

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a bail application made on behalf of Jacob Martin, heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The application was made before Justice Wood and was scheduled for 10:30 a.m. The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved assessing the circumstances of the applicant, Jacob Martin, to determine whether he should be granted bail or kept in custody pending his trial. The court considered factors such as the seriousness of the offence, the risk of flight, the risk of interfering with witnesses or committing further offences, and any other relevant matters.

The court's reasoning and outcome were based on the evidence presented and the arguments made by both the prosecution and the defence. The court heard submissions from the applicant's legal representative, Simon Catto, and considered the relevant laws and legal precedents. Ultimately, the court determined that the applicant should be granted bail, subject to certain conditions that aimed to mitigate the risks associated with his release. The specific conditions imposed by the court were not detailed in the text.

The final orders of the court were that Jacob Martin be granted bail, subject to the conditions outlined by Justice Wood. The applicant was required to comply with these conditions until the conclusion of his trial. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the specific circumstances of the case. The outcome reflects the court's role in balancing the rights of the accused with the need to protect the community and ensure the proper administration of justice.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 19 June 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established