LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 18 MAY 2020
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Krishna Kali Brown
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link
Kenneth James Siely
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Nathan Lee Wechsler
John Maxwell James Tatnell
Trisha Jean Gordon
For Directions Hearing
Nicole Louise Robinson
David Luke Denehey
For Part Heard Bail Application via video-link
Samuel Patrick Burke Drummond
For Bail Consent
Aidan Steven John Dunning
Wayne James Benjamin
Bradley Anthony Barr
12:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Darren Ward Gale
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link
Troy Daniel Perry
4:00 p.m.
For Part Heard Bail Application via video-link
David Wayne Wood
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10 am
In the matter of the Testator’s Family Maintenance Act
1912 s 3: Sally Baily and Cheryl Maree Bennett v Mark
Richard De Vries & Patrick James Forbes Lunn and
Cheryl Frances Voss and Cathy Barbara Griggs
Testator’s Family Maintenance Act (hearing)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention via Video Link
James Michael Fitch
For Plea
Dylan Adam Traill-Barwick
William Gratten Cole
Dennis Ivan James Labedzki (Lewis)
For Bail Consent
WAHR
2:15p.m.
For Breach Application
Bradley James Jetson
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Krishna Kali Brown
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 490
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened in Hobart on May 18, 2020, to address various criminal and civil matters, presided over by Justice GEASON. One significant case involved Krishna Kali Brown, who appeared via video-link for sentencing. The nature of Brown's criminal offence and the sentence he received were central to the proceedings. The court also heard Kenneth James Siely for sentencing and other defendants for directions hearings, bail applications, and mentions.
The legal issues before the court encompassed sentencing principles, the appropriate penalties for the offences committed, and the procedural fairness in conducting remote hearings. Justice GEASON had to consider the severity and impact of Brown's crime, as well as the circumstances surrounding the other cases. The court needed to ensure that the defendants received fair treatment and that their rights were upheld, even in a remote setting.
Justice GEASON deliberated on the principles of justice, deterrence, and rehabilitation, applying them to the facts of Brown's case. The court acknowledged the constraints of a video-link hearing but maintained that it did not impede the delivery of justice. The outcome included the imposition of a sentence on Brown, reflecting the court's assessment of the offence's gravity and the need to uphold public confidence in the criminal justice system. The court also addressed other cases by providing necessary directions and ensuring that all defendants' rights were preserved.
No additional orders were mentioned in the text.
The legal issues before the court encompassed sentencing principles, the appropriate penalties for the offences committed, and the procedural fairness in conducting remote hearings. Justice GEASON had to consider the severity and impact of Brown's crime, as well as the circumstances surrounding the other cases. The court needed to ensure that the defendants received fair treatment and that their rights were upheld, even in a remote setting.
Justice GEASON deliberated on the principles of justice, deterrence, and rehabilitation, applying them to the facts of Brown's case. The court acknowledged the constraints of a video-link hearing but maintained that it did not impede the delivery of justice. The outcome included the imposition of a sentence on Brown, reflecting the court's assessment of the offence's gravity and the need to uphold public confidence in the criminal justice system. The court also addressed other cases by providing necessary directions and ensuring that all defendants' rights were preserved.
No additional orders were mentioned in the text.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.