LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 18 JUNE 2018
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Robert David Edwards
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua James Williams
Michael William Triffitt
For Plea
John Hector Triffitt
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Andrew David Gilley
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
CB
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher David Jenkins
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Alexander Shaquille Thomas Nandan
A Witness
For Trial
EMB
3:30 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Joshua Ali Khan
Matthew Jonathon Stocks
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearings
Brett Freeman
v
Tasmanian Police
Commissioner of State Revenue
v
Melbourne Cheapest Cars Pty Ltd
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Zachary Robert French
To Follow
For Trial
Corey Mitchell Gesler
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
CDP
To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Robert David Edwards
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via
Video Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
CB
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Mention
Bradley Dean Johnston
For Trial
ES
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 18 June 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 431
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 431
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in the Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 were diverse, encompassing both criminal and civil matters. For the criminal cases, the court was required to address directions hearings, mentions, and pleas for various defendants. The legal issues included determining the appropriate course of action for the defendants, setting trial dates, and addressing any procedural matters. In the civil cases, the court was required to conduct directions hearings to facilitate the resolution of disputes between the parties. The legal issues in these cases may have involved determining the admissibility of evidence, setting timelines for the exchange of information, and resolving any procedural disputes. The court's decisions in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the legal issues required careful consideration and analysis.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 demonstrated the court's commitment to efficiently managing a diverse range of legal matters. The court scheduled hearings for both criminal and civil cases across multiple locations in the state. The court's reasoning in these cases would have been informed by the specific legal issues and facts of each case. The outcomes of these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the court's decisions would have contributed to the administration of justice in Tasmania. The law list provided a comprehensive overview of the cases scheduled for the week, allowing legal professionals to prepare for upcoming court appearances and ensuring that the court could efficiently manage its caseload.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 resulted in several orders being made. For the criminal cases, the court made orders regarding directions hearings, mentions, and pleas for various defendants. These orders would have included setting trial dates, determining the appropriate course of action for the defendants, and addressing any procedural matters. In the civil cases, the court made orders to facilitate the resolution of disputes between the parties. These orders may have included determining the admissibility of evidence, setting timelines for the exchange of information, and resolving any procedural disputes. The final orders in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the court's decisions would have contributed to the administration of justice in Tasmania.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.