Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 18 June 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 431


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 18 JUNE 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Robert David Edwards

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua James Williams
Michael William Triffitt

For Plea
John Hector Triffitt

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Andrew David Gilley

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
CB  

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher David Jenkins

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Alexander Shaquille Thomas Nandan
A Witness

For Trial
EMB             

3:30 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence

Joshua Ali Khan
Matthew Jonathon Stocks

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearings
Brett Freeman
v
Tasmanian Police

Commissioner of State Revenue
v

Melbourne Cheapest Cars Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Zachary Robert French

To Follow
For Trial
Corey Mitchell Gesler

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
CDP   

To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Robert David Edwards

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston  
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via
Video Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
CB     

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Mention 
Bradley Dean Johnston

For Trial

ES

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 18 June 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 431
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 431
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued a law list for the week of 18 June 2018. Several criminal and civil cases were scheduled for various courts across the state, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Notable cases included a directions hearing for Robert David Edwards in Launceston, a mention for Joshua James Williams in Hobart, and a plea hearing for Andrew David Gilley in Launceston. Additionally, there were civil directions hearings scheduled in Hobart for Brett Freeman versus the Tasmanian Police Commissioner and State Revenue versus Melbourne Cheapest Cars Pty Ltd. The court also scheduled a mention for Bradley Dean Johnston in Burnie and a trial for Corey Mitchell Gesler in Launceston. The list also included several fact and sentence hearings and mentions for various defendants. The law list provides a comprehensive overview of the cases scheduled for the week, allowing legal professionals to prepare for upcoming court appearances.

The legal issues in the Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 were diverse, encompassing both criminal and civil matters. For the criminal cases, the court was required to address directions hearings, mentions, and pleas for various defendants. The legal issues included determining the appropriate course of action for the defendants, setting trial dates, and addressing any procedural matters. In the civil cases, the court was required to conduct directions hearings to facilitate the resolution of disputes between the parties. The legal issues in these cases may have involved determining the admissibility of evidence, setting timelines for the exchange of information, and resolving any procedural disputes. The court's decisions in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the legal issues required careful consideration and analysis.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 demonstrated the court's commitment to efficiently managing a diverse range of legal matters. The court scheduled hearings for both criminal and civil cases across multiple locations in the state. The court's reasoning in these cases would have been informed by the specific legal issues and facts of each case. The outcomes of these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the court's decisions would have contributed to the administration of justice in Tasmania. The law list provided a comprehensive overview of the cases scheduled for the week, allowing legal professionals to prepare for upcoming court appearances and ensuring that the court could efficiently manage its caseload.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law list for 18 June 2018 resulted in several orders being made. For the criminal cases, the court made orders regarding directions hearings, mentions, and pleas for various defendants. These orders would have included setting trial dates, determining the appropriate course of action for the defendants, and addressing any procedural matters. In the civil cases, the court made orders to facilitate the resolution of disputes between the parties. These orders may have included determining the admissibility of evidence, setting timelines for the exchange of information, and resolving any procedural disputes. The final orders in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, and the court's decisions would have contributed to the administration of justice in Tasmania.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.