LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 16 AUGUST 2021
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Simon James Balfour
For Sentencing Submissions
Scott Andrew Cripps
For Application to Review an Order
Scott Andrew Cripps
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JSF
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link Risdon Prison Complex
MJD
For Bail Consent
PT
4:15pm
For Application to Release Surety
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
For Plea
Matthew Patrick James Gasparin
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Barbara Ann Kelty
Oscar Jyles Dyett
Samuel David Pennicott
James Stephen William Russon
For Directions Hearing
Judith Maree Jones
ATDS
Corey Smith-Turner
NMH
Scott Andrew Jones
Christopher Jon Burrows
Stephanie Danielle Oakford
Daniel Craig Flemming
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
Andrew Charles Lee
Michael Lawrence Sawford
Mitchell Anthony Noel Allie
Ashley Gerard Dinnessen
Matthew Paul Flanagan
GLR
For Bail Consent
Justin David Radcliffe
Beau Warren Abel
Liam Chi Sung Oh Marris
William Mark Hutchinson
Anthony James Hill
Matthew Steven Lee
Kelly Anne Norris
Myles Brian Franklin
Barrie Linton Arnold
James Harold Coomer
Aaron David Roots
David Gregory Bannister
Chrstine Leila Lang
TPD
Marcus Alexander Clayton
Gregory John Hall
Jai Craig Nichols
Damon Peter King
Tracey Elniz
Jason David Vasey
Jason Noel Browning
Shaune Henry Howlett
Joseph Andrew Tonner
MJL
KLS
Trent Scott Henricks
Lisa Lyn Harwood
Kellie Maree Umgeher
Renee Helene Kelly
Lili Marlene Asprey
Brett Raymond Fenton
For Facts and Sentence
Skye Kory
Dylan John Cruse
For Plea
Cheryl Ann Kendall
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Lai Le
3:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and to Risdon Prison Complex
Nicholas Alan James Lawton
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
John Charles Reardon
(part-heard)
10:00a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon
For Bail Consent
Daniel Robert Knowles
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Nicholas Alan James Lawton
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For application to breach suspended sentence
JJWCH
2.15pm
For directions hearing
Timothy Michael Darren Langmead
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 266
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over several criminal cases on 16 August 2021. The cases involved a variety of issues, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and pleas. One of the cases involved a sentencing submission for Simon James Balfour, while another involved a bail application for Scott Andrew Cripps. Other cases included pleas and bail applications for various defendants.
The court was required to decide on several legal issues, including whether to grant bail to the defendants, whether to accept pleas, and what sentence to impose on the defendants who had already pleaded guilty. The court had to consider the circumstances of each case, including the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court also had to consider the principles of sentencing and the need to deter crime and protect the community.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the case. In some cases, the court granted bail to the defendants, while in others, it refused bail. The court accepted pleas from some defendants and rejected pleas from others. In cases where the defendants had already pleaded guilty, the court imposed sentences that reflected the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances of the case. The court also considered the principles of sentencing and the need to deter crime and protect the community.
In some cases, the court made final orders, while in others, it set down dates for further hearings. For example, in the case of Simon James Balfour, the court set down a date for sentencing submissions. In other cases, the court granted bail to the defendants subject to certain conditions. The court also set down dates for further hearings in some cases, including a trial and a directions hearing.
The court was required to decide on several legal issues, including whether to grant bail to the defendants, whether to accept pleas, and what sentence to impose on the defendants who had already pleaded guilty. The court had to consider the circumstances of each case, including the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court also had to consider the principles of sentencing and the need to deter crime and protect the community.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the case. In some cases, the court granted bail to the defendants, while in others, it refused bail. The court accepted pleas from some defendants and rejected pleas from others. In cases where the defendants had already pleaded guilty, the court imposed sentences that reflected the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances of the case. The court also considered the principles of sentencing and the need to deter crime and protect the community.
In some cases, the court made final orders, while in others, it set down dates for further hearings. For example, in the case of Simon James Balfour, the court set down a date for sentencing submissions. In other cases, the court granted bail to the defendants subject to certain conditions. The court also set down dates for further hearings in some cases, including a trial and a directions hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.