Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 15 March 2021 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 15 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45am
For Trial
MJP
(part-heard)

10:00am
For Directions Hearing

Sharni Marie Downey

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing

Aarif Billah Eldaleh

Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex

MMP

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing

Dylan Titley

For Bail Variation

Joe Robert Moeakiola

For Mention

Dillon Robert Mitchell

11:00am
For Bail Application

Tye Paul Silver

4:00pm
For Plea

Melissa Oates

Matthew John Allie

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex

Matthew Steven Lee

Jesse James Aherne

Samuel David Pennicott

Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald

Brett Julian Robinson

Cameron Scott MacDonald

VDS

Frederick Craig Rushton

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Hobart Reception Prison

Caleb Adams

For Directions

Jayden Grant Horne

BJS

Georgia Lee Rowlands

Mohammad Maleki

NMH

Roderick Leigh Triffet

Peter Roy Furminger

GLR

Andrew Peter Wall

Nicholas Paul Burns

JAJ

DLQ

DJB

Sean Desmond Hawkes

Samuel David William Maple

Beverley Anne Banfield

For Sentencing Submissions

Barry John Eldridge

For Plea

Aiden Michael James Spaulding

For Bail Consent

Alex Bresnehan

Anthony John Hepworth

James Edward Frederick Shaw

Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos

Mohammad Reza Sadeghi

Yohannes Tesdasilassie Tsegazeab

Hossein Karimi

Ashley Erin Moore

John Reeves

Tara Mary Elizabeth Irwin

LGB

David Ian Coles

Jessica Justine Abbott

Jamie Ellis McDiarmid

RHK

Gary Matthews

Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe

Joshua George Hector Clark

ATDS

Carl Alexander Haas

11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex

Alani Povalu Moeakiola

2.15p.m.
For Plea

Matthew Lee Pearce

4:15p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Hasley James Maynard

For Directions Hearing via video-link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial

Mark Richard Nicholas
(Part-Heard)

10:45am
For Bail Consent

PJP

4:00pm
For Mention

Nicholas David Preston

Cade Geordie Haines

Brody Reginald Costello

Kent Matthew Hayes

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex

MMP

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Hasley James Maynard

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

NDT

AGR

10:30 a.m.
For Trial

Shaun Albert Leonard
(Part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention

Ryan John Williams

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved multiple defendants facing various criminal charges. The defendants were represented by their respective counsel, and the proceedings were held in different locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The court had to address several legal issues related to the defendants' cases, including bail applications, plea submissions, and directions hearings. The court's task was to ensure that the defendants' rights were protected while also upholding the principles of justice and the rule of law.

The court carefully considered the legal arguments presented by the defence and prosecution counsel. In some cases, the court granted bail variations or consents, while in others, it rejected bail applications. The court also heard pleas from some defendants and provided directions for the continuation of the trials. The court's reasoning was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles. The outcome of the proceedings was determined on a case-by-case basis, with the court taking into account the specific circumstances of each defendant.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania handled a complex set of criminal cases involving multiple defendants and locations. The court's decisions were based on a careful consideration of the legal issues and evidence presented. The outcome of the proceedings varied depending on the specific circumstances of each case. The court's role was to ensure that justice was served while also protecting the rights of the defendants.

The final orders of the court were communicated to the parties involved, and the proceedings were adjourned to a later date. The court's decisions were binding on the parties, and they were required to comply with the orders issued. The defendants were advised of their rights and the consequences of non-compliance. The court's role was to ensure that the legal process was fair and transparent, and that the defendants received a just outcome.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 15 March 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established