Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 15 June 2020HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the Full Court4:15 p.m.For Decision Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty LtdCourt 2, Salamanca...

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 15 JUNE 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
4:15 p.m.
For Decision
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:15 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Aiden Jack Binnie

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing Scott Steven Saxelby
Anthony James Hill
Ahlen Arn Kikuchi
Emma-Kate Gray

For Bail Consent
Brenden Edward Cotter
Jodie Kay Moffatt
For Bail Application via video-link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Georgia-May Smith

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Maree Matic v Simpson Networks Pty Ltd & Ors
Further amend defence and counterclaim

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
DJ
For Sentence
Patrick Charles Curbishley

For Application
Bradley James Jetson

For Bail Consent
Peter Gary Farrow

4:15p.m.
For Mention
ARJ Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Georgia-May Smith

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Andrew Dawson
Jamie Lee Stein

For Directions Hearing
AGR
Christine Joy Radford
WDR
Tyler Jeremy Angel
WD
Andrew Stephen Glover

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
MJP
Alan Stephen Dunham

For Plea
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Michael Reginald McCullagh
Oscar Jyles Dyett

2:15p.m.
For Bail Variation
Morgan Joel Howard

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Andrew John Case

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Brocklands Pty Ltd versus Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd was heard in Court 2 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The dispute centred on contractual obligations and the adequacy of services provided by Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd to Brocklands Pty Ltd. The full court was convened to hear the matter, considering the complexities and implications of the contractual breach at hand.

The primary legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of the contract between the parties, the extent of Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd’s obligations under the contract, and whether the services provided met the contractual standards. Additionally, the court needed to determine if Brocklands Pty Ltd had valid grounds for claiming damages due to the alleged failure of Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd to perform its contractual duties adequately.

The court meticulously examined the contractual terms and the evidence presented by both parties. It considered the specific clauses related to the services and the performance benchmarks set forth in the contract. The court also weighed the testimonies and expert opinions to assess the adequacy of the services provided. Ultimately, the court found that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd had failed to meet certain contractual obligations, leading to a breach. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of Brocklands Pty Ltd, awarding them compensation for the breach of contract.

In conclusion, the final orders of the court mandated that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd compensate Brocklands Pty Ltd for the damages incurred due to the breach of contract, setting a specific amount for the compensation based on the findings of the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established