Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 15 February 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction4:00 p.mFor Directions Hearing via video-linkK H L Court 2,

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 31


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
K H L

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Mention
Amanda Louise White

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
John Maxwell James Tatnell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
MMP  
Aiden Michael Spaulding
VDS   
ZHB   
JRB    
Samuel David Pennicott
Alani Moeakiola
Daniel Joseph Williams
Jason Darrell Triffett
Dean Phillip Braslin

For Directions Hearing via video link to Mary Hutchinson’s Women’s Prison
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Directions Hearing via video link to X
SPM               

For Directions Hearing
LEC               
JDP                
James Edward Frederick Shaw
Ryan Edward Brown
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Sophie Michelle Lynch
Shane Michael Palmer
DJB    
EEVP             
Corey Adam Lockwood
Michael Linden Dennison
MJP                
Kylie Louise Wise
Mark Kyle Sherman
Rebecca Maree Jones

For Plea
Andrew Brett Bell

For Application to Vary Bail
Frederick Craig Rushton

For Bail Application via video link to Ron Barwick Prison
Robert Leigh Cowen

For Bail Application via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Daniel Cure

For Bail Consent
Aarif Billah Eldaleh
Daniel John Ernest Dadson
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
DLQ   
Maryann Wall
Anthony Stephen Butcher
PAC   
Shane Christopher Hardman
Anthony James Hill
Gregory John Hall
Marcus Alexander Clayton
Arron Roots
James Harold Coomer

2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions
Dallas John Eaves

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
3:00pm
For Hearing
Clarence City Council v Mark Drury

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Joshua Michael Murtagh
(part-heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Directions Hearing
Jeffrey Robert Anderson
Cade Geordie Haines
Heath Maxwell Lethborg

For Bail Consent
Nicholas David PrestonPatrick Charles Curbishley 

10:30a.m
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones
(part-heard)

PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
From Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Risdon Prison Complex and to
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Levi Joseph David Hall

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to
Risdon Prison Complex and to
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Levi Joseph David Hall

For Directions Hearing
Shaun Albert Leonard

For Mention
Brodie Lee Smith

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 31
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Amanda Louise White was before the Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart. The case involved directions and bail hearings for various criminal defendants, including White, who was scheduled for a directions hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex. Each defendant faced different charges, ranging from serious offences such as murder to lesser criminal activities. The court's primary task was to manage the procedural aspects of the cases, including scheduling and ensuring compliance with legal protocols.

The legal issues the court had to address involved determining the appropriate procedural steps for each case. This included confirming the availability and compliance of defendants with bail conditions, assessing the readiness of each case for trial, and ensuring that all legal requirements were met for a fair and efficient trial process. The court needed to balance the rights of the accused with the need to maintain public safety and ensure that the judicial process was not unduly delayed.

Justice ESTCOURT outlined the reasoning behind the court's decisions, emphasizing the need for each case to proceed in a manner that was both just and efficient. The court acknowledged the seriousness of the charges against the defendants and the importance of ensuring that all legal rights were upheld. The outcome of the hearing was that directions were given for the next steps in each case, and bail conditions were reviewed and, in some cases, varied to ensure compliance with legal standards. Final orders were made to ensure that the cases would proceed in an orderly manner, with each defendant's rights being respected throughout the process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.