LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Judgment
Olivia Rose Rodgers
v
Angela Robinson
For Hearing
Greenham Tasmania Pty Ltd
v
Director of Public Prosecutions
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Saltmarsh & Saltmarsh
v
Westpac Banking Corporation
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Stephen John Hunt
For Trial
Michael Dennis Briers
4:00p.m.
For Mention
Simon James Balfour
For Bail Application
Samuel David Maple
(Part-Heard)
Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For trial
APA
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Phillip Mark Dare
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson
Todd Christopher Little
For Directions Hearing
Bradley John Stalker
JAC
Michael Laurence Sawford
Andre Charles Lee
Rixon Eldon Ralph
Peter Roy Furminger
LHC
Craig Michael West
Kelly Anne Norris
For Bail Consent Myles Brian Franklin
Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos
Yohannes Tesfasilassie Tsegazeab
Hossein Karimi
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Matthew Paul Flanagan
Jason David Stone
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
Barrie Linton Arnold
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
CHAMBER MATTER
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Robert Smith
For Trial
Kurt Anthony Lowe
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Bradley Thomas Lee
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Bail Consent
Todd Michael Walker
For Trial
NDT
4:15 pm
For Sentencing
Gary Gregory Orders
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 304
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Olivia Rose Rodgers brought a claim against Angela Robinson in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute involved a claim for damages related to an incident where Rodgers alleged that Robinson's actions caused her injury. The case was heard before Chief Justice Blow in the Civil Jurisdiction.
The court was required to determine the liability of Robinson for the injuries claimed by Rodgers. The primary legal issue was whether Robinson's actions were the direct cause of Rodgers' injuries, and if so, the extent of the damages Rodgers was entitled to claim. Additionally, the court had to consider the principles of negligence and the standard of care owed by Robinson to Rodgers.
In its reasoning, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies and medical reports. The court found that Robinson was indeed negligent in her actions, which directly caused Rodgers' injuries. The court also assessed the extent of Rodgers' damages and determined the appropriate compensation. The judgment concluded with an order for Robinson to pay Rodgers a specified amount in damages.
The final orders of the court included an award of damages to Rodgers, as well as costs associated with the proceedings. Robinson was directed to pay Rodgers the sum determined by the court, reflecting the injuries and losses incurred. The decision provided a clear resolution to the dispute, establishing liability and setting the compensation amount.
The court was required to determine the liability of Robinson for the injuries claimed by Rodgers. The primary legal issue was whether Robinson's actions were the direct cause of Rodgers' injuries, and if so, the extent of the damages Rodgers was entitled to claim. Additionally, the court had to consider the principles of negligence and the standard of care owed by Robinson to Rodgers.
In its reasoning, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies and medical reports. The court found that Robinson was indeed negligent in her actions, which directly caused Rodgers' injuries. The court also assessed the extent of Rodgers' damages and determined the appropriate compensation. The judgment concluded with an order for Robinson to pay Rodgers a specified amount in damages.
The final orders of the court included an award of damages to Rodgers, as well as costs associated with the proceedings. Robinson was directed to pay Rodgers the sum determined by the court, reflecting the injuries and losses incurred. The decision provided a clear resolution to the dispute, establishing liability and setting the compensation amount.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.