Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 12, November 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 12, NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Lorraine Elizabeth Jordan
V
Criminal Injuries Compensation Commission – Commissioner F Neasey

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated v Andrew Paul - General Manager Clarence City Council

Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated v Martin Gill – General Manager Meander Valley Council

Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated v Gary Arnold – General Manager Kingborough Council

Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated v Nick Heath – General Manager Hobart City Council

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Robert Allen
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Legal Argument
Anthony Lisle Shepherd

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was engaged in a variety of proceedings on 12 November 2018. Among these cases was a hearing for Lorraine Elizabeth Jordan against the Criminal Injuries Compensation Commission, which was scheduled for the morning session in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The afternoon session saw a continuation of the case involving Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated against multiple respondents, including general managers from various city and council authorities. The court was also scheduled to deliver a judgment on this matter.

The legal issues that came before the court in these cases included questions of compensation eligibility and procedural fairness in claims against the Criminal Injuries Compensation Commission, as well as disputes over the applicability of statutory provisions in the context of public liability claims by Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated against municipal authorities. The court had to consider the interpretation of relevant legislation and case law to determine the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

In its reasoning, the court addressed the nuances of the statutory provisions and the procedural steps that needed to be followed. The court examined the evidence presented and the legal arguments from both parties to reach its conclusions. The outcome of these hearings and judgments would have significant implications for the parties involved, particularly in terms of compensation entitlements and the obligations of municipal authorities under the law.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the provided text, but they would have included directives and rulings that followed from the court's reasoning and interpretation of the law. These orders would have guided the next steps for the parties in pursuing or defending their respective claims.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 12, November 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established