Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 10 May 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Sentence MKL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 141


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 10 MAY 2021

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Sentence MKL     
KJS                
For MentionJarrod James Cartledge

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Allen Michael Prestage and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Michael Thorne and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Scott Francis Howells and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
(Part-heard)

Monday, 10 May 2021
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Daniel Robert Knowles

For Mention
TJR                 
Jordan Peter Poland

For Trial
KWDF           
(Part-heard)

4:15pm
For Mention
Anthony John Smith
Bradley Kenneth Brown

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Anthony Ray Laoumtzis

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.For TrialDaniel John Ernest Dadson

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Wilfred Lopes Centre

Shaun James Scott

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Brandon Malcolm Charlesworth
Paul Jason Berry
Shayden James Cowen

For Directions Hearing
Andrew Roger Fairfield   
Nicholas Samuel Jordan 
Daniel Nicky Smith
Johnathan Henry Holmes
Stephen John Hunt
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Frederick Craig Rushton 
LGB
Anthony John Hepworth
TPB
Stephanie Danielle Oakford
Sean Desmond Hawkes
Amanda Louise White
DJB
Jason Darrell Triffett 
Andrew Peter Wall
Budde Mitchell Byrne
SCN
Jye Matthew Lowry
Brett Raymond Fenton

For Bail Consent
PJS
Sophie Michelle Lynch
PAC
MJP
Barry Douglas Salter
Corey Adam Lockwood
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid

For Bail Application
Sean Andrew Hall

2:15p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

2:15pm
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
SCN

4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Kain Lewis Cowen

For Sentence via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex and to Hobart Reception Prison
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via MS TEAMS
For Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Limited (ACN 084 464 746) v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ACN 005 357 522) and ors
12:00p.m. via MS TEAMS
For Hearing
River Street Tas Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investment
Commission

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Jacob Alexander Ralph Haworth
For Trial
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler
(part heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m

For Mention
Zannon Tony Howard
Andrew Stewart Morrison

For Bail Consent
Timothy Michael-Darren Langmead

For Trial
Michael Andrew Smith

(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m
For Mention via video-link
Adrian James Roy Oates

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 10 May 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Sentence MKL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â KJS Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â For MentionJarrod James Cartledge [2021] TASSCCourtlist 141
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 141
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved Jarrod James Cartledge, who was scheduled for sentencing. The court was presided over by Chief Justice Blow. The dispute centred around the appropriate sentence to be imposed on Cartledge following a conviction. The legal issues for the court to decide were the appropriate sentencing principles to apply and the specific sentence that would be just and proportionate to the offence committed.

The court considered the nature and circumstances of the offence, Cartledge's criminal history, and the principles of deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation. In delivering the judgment, the Chief Justice examined the aggravating and mitigating factors relevant to the case. The court found that while the offence was serious, certain mitigating factors should be taken into account. Ultimately, the Chief Justice determined that a custodial sentence was necessary but sought to balance the need for punishment with the potential for Cartledge's rehabilitation. The court imposed a sentence of imprisonment with specific conditions aimed at addressing the underlying issues that contributed to the offending behaviour.

The final orders of the court included a custodial sentence with detailed conditions and requirements to be met during the term of imprisonment, as well as any post-release obligations. The court's decision reflected a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the unique circumstances of the offender.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.