LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 10 MAY 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Sentence MKL
KJS
For MentionJarrod James Cartledge
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Allen Michael Prestage and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Michael Thorne and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Scott Francis Howells and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
(Part-heard)
Monday, 10 May 2021
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Daniel Robert Knowles
For Mention
TJR
Jordan Peter Poland
For Trial
KWDF
(Part-heard)
4:15pm
For Mention
Anthony John Smith
Bradley Kenneth Brown
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Anthony Ray Laoumtzis
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.For TrialDaniel John Ernest Dadson
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Wilfred Lopes Centre
Shaun James Scott
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Brandon Malcolm Charlesworth
Paul Jason Berry
Shayden James Cowen
For Directions Hearing
Andrew Roger Fairfield
Nicholas Samuel Jordan
Daniel Nicky Smith
Johnathan Henry Holmes
Stephen John Hunt
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Frederick Craig Rushton
LGB
Anthony John Hepworth
TPB
Stephanie Danielle Oakford
Sean Desmond Hawkes
Amanda Louise White
DJB
Jason Darrell Triffett
Andrew Peter Wall
Budde Mitchell Byrne
SCN
Jye Matthew Lowry
Brett Raymond Fenton
For Bail Consent
PJS
Sophie Michelle Lynch
PAC
MJP
Barry Douglas Salter
Corey Adam Lockwood
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
For Bail Application
Sean Andrew Hall
2:15p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Kain Lewis Cowen
For Sentence via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex and to Hobart Reception Prison
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via MS TEAMSFor Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Limited (ACN 084 464 746) v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ACN 005 357 522) and ors
12:00p.m. via MS TEAMS
For Hearing
River Street Tas Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investment
Commission
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Jacob Alexander Ralph Haworth
For Trial
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler
(part heard)
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
Zannon Tony Howard
Andrew Stewart Morrison
For Bail Consent
Timothy Michael-Darren Langmead
For Trial
Michael Andrew Smith
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m
For Mention via video-link
Adrian James Roy Oates
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 140
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case was heard before Chief Justice Blow in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The matter involved a sentencing hearing for an individual identified as MKL. The specifics of the crime and the proceedings leading to this point are not detailed in the provided text, but the nature of the dispute was related to criminal sentencing.
The primary legal issue before the court was determining the appropriate sentence for the defendant, MKL, following their conviction. The court had to consider various factors such as the nature and circumstances of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the sentence was proportionate and aligned with legal standards and precedents.
The Chief Justice, in delivering the sentence, carefully reviewed the evidence and arguments presented. The court took into account the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's prior criminal record, and any other relevant factors. The final sentence imposed was in accordance with these considerations, reflecting a balanced approach to justice. The specific details of the sentence were not outlined in the provided excerpt.
The primary legal issue before the court was determining the appropriate sentence for the defendant, MKL, following their conviction. The court had to consider various factors such as the nature and circumstances of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the sentence was proportionate and aligned with legal standards and precedents.
The Chief Justice, in delivering the sentence, carefully reviewed the evidence and arguments presented. The court took into account the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's prior criminal record, and any other relevant factors. The final sentence imposed was in accordance with these considerations, reflecting a balanced approach to justice. The specific details of the sentence were not outlined in the provided excerpt.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.