LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 1 NOVEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
11:00a.m.
Ceremonial Sittings to welcome the Honourable Justice Jago
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Todd Christopher Little
For Directions Hearing
CAL
Adam John Lipscombe
For Bail Application
David George Evans
JKW
Adrian John Harris
Skye Christina Harris
For Bail Consent
Jordyn Jack Webb
Carroll Anne Anderson-Lingo
Corey Adam Lockwood
Melinda Ann Berry
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Fahad Al-Dakak
Floyd Dylan Mansfield
Beau Warren Abel
RAD
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:45 p.m.
For Mention
AWK
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
William John Chistopher Mc Fardzean Foran
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00p.m.
For Bail Application-`
Mitchell Allie
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 369
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved a criminal jurisdiction matter in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, where the respondent, Todd Christopher Little, faced a directions hearing via video link. The matter was heard before Chief Justice Blow. The respondent was represented by counsel, while the applicant, Adam John Lipscombe, was also represented by counsel. The case centred on the procedural steps to be taken in the ongoing criminal proceedings against the respondent.
The court was required to decide on the procedural directions for the upcoming criminal proceedings, including the scheduling of further hearings and the management of the case. This involved determining the appropriate timeline for the respondent's case and ensuring that the legal process was followed correctly. The court also needed to consider the respondent's right to a fair trial and the need for efficient case management.
Justice Blow, in delivering the decision, outlined the procedural steps to be taken in the upcoming criminal proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the legal process and ensuring that the respondent's right to a fair trial was upheld. The directions included setting a timeline for further hearings and the management of the case. The court also considered the need for efficient case management and the importance of ensuring that the proceedings were conducted in a timely and effective manner.
The court issued directions for the ongoing criminal proceedings against the respondent, Todd Christopher Little. The directions included setting a timeline for further hearings and the management of the case. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the legal process and ensuring that the respondent's right to a fair trial was upheld. The final orders ensured that the proceedings would be conducted in a timely and effective manner.
The court was required to decide on the procedural directions for the upcoming criminal proceedings, including the scheduling of further hearings and the management of the case. This involved determining the appropriate timeline for the respondent's case and ensuring that the legal process was followed correctly. The court also needed to consider the respondent's right to a fair trial and the need for efficient case management.
Justice Blow, in delivering the decision, outlined the procedural steps to be taken in the upcoming criminal proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the legal process and ensuring that the respondent's right to a fair trial was upheld. The directions included setting a timeline for further hearings and the management of the case. The court also considered the need for efficient case management and the importance of ensuring that the proceedings were conducted in a timely and effective manner.
The court issued directions for the ongoing criminal proceedings against the respondent, Todd Christopher Little. The directions included setting a timeline for further hearings and the management of the case. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the legal process and ensuring that the respondent's right to a fair trial was upheld. The final orders ensured that the proceedings would be conducted in a timely and effective manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.