Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 1 November 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 370


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 1 NOVEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
11:00a.m.
Ceremonial Sittings to welcome the Honourable Justice Jago

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Todd Christopher Little

For Directions Hearing
CAL   
Adam John Lipscombe

For Bail Application
Adrian John Harris
David George Evans
JKW   
Adrian John Harris
Skye Christina Harris

For Bail Consent
Jordyn Jack Webb
Carroll Anne Anderson-Lingo
Corey Adam Lockwood
Melinda Ann Berry
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Fahad Al-Dakak
Floyd Dylan Mansfield
Beau Warren Abel
RAD   

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

3:45 p.m.
For Mention
AWK

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
William John Chistopher Mc Fardzean Foran

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00p.m.
For Bail Application-`
Mitchell Allie

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 1 November 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 370
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 370
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania recently heard a number of criminal matters, including a directions hearing, a bail application, and a bail consent. The cases involved several individuals, each with their own unique circumstances and legal issues. The court was required to consider a range of factors, including the nature and severity of the alleged offences, the circumstances of each individual, and any relevant legal principles or precedents.

In the directions hearing, the court was asked to provide guidance on the next steps in the legal process for the accused. The court considered the evidence presented and the arguments made by the parties before making its decision. Similarly, in the bail application, the court was asked to consider whether the accused should be granted bail, taking into account factors such as the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and any concerns about public safety. The court also heard a bail consent, where the accused and the prosecution agreed on the terms of bail.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented. The court applied relevant legal principles and precedents to reach its decision, taking into account the unique circumstances of each individual. In some cases, the court granted bail or provided directions for the next steps in the legal process, while in others, the court denied bail or made other orders as appropriate.

Overall, the court's decisions in these cases demonstrate its commitment to ensuring that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner. The court carefully considered each case on its merits, applying the relevant legal principles and precedents to reach a decision that is in the best interests of justice. The outcomes of these cases will have important implications for the accused individuals, as well as for the broader community.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.