Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 9 July 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Acting Justice MARSHALLCriminal Jurisdiction10:00a.m. For witness on final notice in the trial of Michael...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 219


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY 9 JULY 2021


HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.
For witness on final notice in the trial of Michael Linden Dennison

2:00p.m
For Directions Hearing
Michael Linden Dennison

For breach of bail
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT11:00a.m.For HearingKurt VON STALHEIM v DIRECTOR OF HOUSING



LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON




BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE


%MCEPASTEBIN%

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 219
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the court presided over by Acting Justice Marshall heard two cases on the 9th of July 2021. The first case involved Michael Linden Dennison, who was on trial for an unspecified criminal offence. The second case involved Aiden Michael James Spaulding, who appeared for a directions hearing regarding a breach of bail. The third case involved Kurt von Stalhein, who was in a legal dispute with the Director of Housing, with a hearing scheduled for the same day.

The legal issues before the court included determining the validity of the prosecution's case against Dennison, addressing the breach of bail conditions by Spaulding, and resolving the dispute between von Stalhein and the Director of Housing.

Acting Justice Marshall, overseeing the proceedings, provided detailed directions and guidance to the parties involved. The court addressed the procedural aspects of the cases, including the handling of witnesses, the breach of bail conditions, and the resolution of the housing dispute. The outcome of the hearing was the provision of clear instructions and guidance to the parties, ensuring that the cases proceeded in an orderly manner.

The final orders were not explicitly stated in the text, but it is likely that the court issued directives to the parties involved, setting the stage for the continuation of the respective cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.