Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 9 February 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 9 FEBRUARY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
SWB

For Trial
Russell John Nowoczynski
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Bryan Edward Arthur Kean
Scott Andrew Cripps

For Bail Consent
David William Michaelson
Jarrod Anthony McKenna
Aaron Roy Johnston

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention by video link
Ross Gary Mitchell

For Plea in Mitigation
George Joseph Bilinski

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Patrick Charles Hay

For Trial
David Leslie Chandler

(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Justin Richard Maynard
Shannon Myree Arnold
Mark Anthony Lanteri
Emma May Wordsworth

For Bail Consent
Aaron John Cleaver
Kiama Declan Ramsdale
DJT

For Facts and Sentence
Amelia Jane Grainger
LGH

For Bail Application
Ricky Damian Brown
(Part-Heard)
Mitchell Allie
Chauncy Aaron Bell

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Joseph Susnja

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor
(Part-Heard)

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Mujkic Family Company Pty Ltd and Ors
v
Clarke & Gee Pty Ltd and Anor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m. via video link to Brisbane
Amend Writ and Statement of Claim
Peter Pittiglio
v
Dean Pittiglio

2:15 p.m.
Objection to Subpoena
Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Application by Video Link
Daniel John Ewell
Sean Darcy Watkins

To Follow
For Mention
Troy Anton Lovell
Kevin Peter McIntosh
Matthew James Mahnken

2:00pm For Sentence
Carl Hordvik Hume

2:15pm For Bail Application
Samual Clinton Wilmot

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
MAG
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of criminal and civil cases on Friday, 9 February 2018. In the criminal jurisdiction, several defendants appeared before different judges for various hearings, including bail applications, trials, and mentions. Notable cases included Russell John Nowoczynski and David Leslie Chandler, who were scheduled for trials and part-heard cases, respectively. In the civil jurisdiction, cases were heard concerning motor accidents insurance, miscellaneous civil business, and objections to subpoenas. The court also handled cases via video link, indicating the use of technology in judicial proceedings.

The legal issues before the court ranged from bail applications to substantive trials and sentence hearings. For instance, the court had to consider whether bail should be granted to defendants based on the circumstances of their cases and the risk they posed to the community. In civil matters, the court dealt with disputes over insurance claims, contractual obligations, and procedural objections. The decisions made in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved, impacting their legal rights and obligations.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were specific to each case, reflecting the unique facts and legal principles applicable. For example, in bail applications, the court weighed factors such as the severity of the alleged offence, the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court, and any risk to the community. In trials, the court would assess the evidence presented and determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants based on the applicable laws. The outcomes of these hearings would guide the subsequent legal processes and potentially result in sentences or resolutions in civil disputes.

The final orders made by the court were not explicitly detailed in the list, but they would typically include directives for further hearings, decisions on bail, and outcomes of trials. These orders would form the basis for the next steps in the legal proceedings for each case, ensuring that the judicial process continued in a structured and lawful manner.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 9 February 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established