Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 9 December 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 271


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 9 DECEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Hock Leong Chia
Nicholas Aaron Scott

For Trial
Brent Anthony Cordwell
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:50 a.m.
For Trial
Blake Cameron McPherson
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Zachariah Angus Denwer-Ripper

For Directions Hearing
Jamie Gregory McCrossen

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Gaurav Endlay
Benjamin Lee Noyes
Emma May Wordsworth
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
Dane Ronald Pyke
A Witness

For Application to Revoke Supervision Order
Ahmed Muhyi-Aldin Eldaleh

For Sentence
Via Video Link to Burnie Supreme Court
Ross Richard Gladwin
Stephen John Henderson

For Plea
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith

12:00 p.m.
For Mention
MG

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Klaus Dieter Neubert

For Mention
DJL   
Alison Renee Hall

For Bail Application
Kerry Alexander Bilston

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
James Ernest Davey

For Sentence via Video Link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Malcolm Bruce Garwood

For Bail Application via Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Luke David Buck

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Set Down for Hearing
Diane Rae and ors
v
Alan Irish

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Sentence via video link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
James Stanley Morcom

To Follow

For Sentence
Simon Mark Ratcliffe
Michael Anthony Slater
AOH

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence by video Link
Ross Richard Gladwin

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 9 December 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 271
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 271
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Diane Rae and others versus Alan Irish was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The plaintiffs sought relief in a civil matter, with the specifics of their claims not detailed in the summary. The hearing was presided over by Justice Brett in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court needed to address involved the interpretation and application of certain civil law principles to the facts of the case. The core of the dispute revolved around the rights and obligations of the parties under the terms of their agreement or the applicable statutory provisions. The court had to determine whether the plaintiffs' claims were substantiated and, if so, what remedies were appropriate.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Brett meticulously examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims were not substantiated by the evidence provided. Consequently, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' action, finding in favour of the defendant. Justice Brett's decision was grounded in a thorough analysis of the legal principles and factual findings.

The final orders of the court were that the plaintiffs' claims were dismissed in their entirety, and the defendant was to receive costs of the proceedings. This outcome effectively concluded the litigation between the parties, with no further appeal or legal action pending.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.