Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 7 May 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction2:00p.m.For Hearing Chien Cheng Liao      v Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 139


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 7 MAY 2021

HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction2:00p.m.For Hearing Chien Cheng Liao      
v
Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Rachelle Maree O’Brien

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
KWDF
(Part-heard)
12:00pm
For Application to Vary Bail
Damien Steven Matthews

For Bail Application
Zachery Saul Syme

For Plea
Bradley Jones

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Mention
Steven Kons v Local Government Code of Conduct Panel and anor

For Mention
Tracey Lee Blocki v Gabriele Ann Hansen

For Mention
Ruth Marcelo Schweinitz v Teresa Margarita Schweinitz and ors

11:00a.m.
For Hearing – Preliminary Point
Konrad Peter Plachta as Administrator of the Estate of the Late Bettina Fairbairn v Nicholas Lachlan Fairbairn and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler
(part heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m
For Mention
Simon James Balfour

10:00 a.m
For Mention
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Samuel John Johnson
Peter Christian Rogers
Liam Kerry Whitton-Lowe
Max Elliott Waymouth

For Trial
Michael Andrew Smith

Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Mention
Steven Kons v Local Government Code of Conduct Panel and anor

For Mention
Tracey Lee Blocki v Gabriele Ann Hansen

For Mention
Ruth Marcelo Schweinitz v Teresa Margarita Schweinitz and ors

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 7 May 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction2:00p.m.For Hearing Chien Cheng Liao      v Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd [2021] TASSCCourtlist 139
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 139
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Chien Cheng Liao v Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd was heard before Chief Justice Blow in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was a civil matter related to an agreement between the parties. The court was tasked with determining whether there was a valid and binding contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, and if so, whether the defendant had breached the terms of the contract.

The primary legal issues before the court were the existence and terms of the contract between the parties, as well as any potential breaches of that contract. The court had to examine the evidence presented by both parties and determine the intention of the parties when entering into the agreement. Additionally, the court had to consider whether there were any valid defenses or counter-claims that could be raised by either party.

The court found that a valid contract existed between the parties, and that the defendant had breached the terms of the contract. The court detailed the evidence and legal principles that led to this conclusion, including the terms of the contract, the conduct of the parties, and relevant case law. The court concluded that the defendant was liable for the breach and ordered appropriate remedies. The final orders included compensation for the plaintiff and a declaration regarding the existence and terms of the contract.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.