LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 6 NOVEMBER 2020
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jye David Cowen
Matthew John Davey
For Mention
RPP
Jenna Maree Black
Christopher James Brown
Cheyenna Margaret McGuire
BJB
Izac Riley King
For Plea
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
Ty Ferguson
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Brett Andrew Imlach
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Lachlan Justin Plummer
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Michael Richard Saltmarsh and Jillian Anne Saltmarsh
v
Westpac Banking Corporation
3:00 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Kim Haines
v
Cliff Martindale
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Sandra Margaret Clark v Peter William Applegate
For Directions Hearing
Amanda June Hibbs v Cameron David Balfour
For Directions Hearing
Estate of the late Eva Geraldine Williams: Allan Francis Williams v Allan Francis Williams as Executors of the estate of Eva Geraldine Williams
For Notice to Review
Kale Brian Groves v Constable Renee Koehler
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Sentence via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Codie Ken Fazackerley
For Sentence
Ethan Daniel Baker
For Sentence via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Bradley Colin Hay
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Brendan Keil
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Benjamin Scott Parry
For Bail Consent
Paul Laurence Lowe
For Trial
Katrina Dianne Newitt
(part heard)
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1104
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Jye David Cowen and Matthew John Davey was presented for mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex. The court was tasked with addressing matters pertaining to these defendants. The legal issues before the court involved procedural and substantive aspects of the criminal cases, including the handling of pleas, disputed facts, and potential sentencing.
The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected while efficiently managing the court's caseload. Justice Estcourt considered the procedural fairness and the need for clear legal representation. The outcome involved setting specific dates for plea hearings and disputed facts hearings, ensuring that the defendants were properly informed and prepared for the next steps in their respective cases.
In summary, the court's decisions were aimed at facilitating the timely and fair progression of the criminal proceedings against Jye David Cowen and Matthew John Davey. The final orders included setting specific dates for future court appearances, ensuring that all legal requirements were met in accordance with the court's procedural rules.
The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected while efficiently managing the court's caseload. Justice Estcourt considered the procedural fairness and the need for clear legal representation. The outcome involved setting specific dates for plea hearings and disputed facts hearings, ensuring that the defendants were properly informed and prepared for the next steps in their respective cases.
In summary, the court's decisions were aimed at facilitating the timely and fair progression of the criminal proceedings against Jye David Cowen and Matthew John Davey. The final orders included setting specific dates for future court appearances, ensuring that all legal requirements were met in accordance with the court's procedural rules.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.