LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 6 AUGUST 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:00pm
Matthew Shane Macdonald
Kesabi Koirala
Thomas Francis Kerr
Lucy Isabella Dargaville
Samuel Gwilym Wilson
2:45pm
Bernard Teck Yang Goh
Sean Oosthuizen
Jock Michael Denehey
Gabrielle Peta Carswell
Kieran Patrick Byfield
3:30pm
Richard Zachary Bury
J Min Kok
Veronica Sharma
Jing Lin Quek
Lilly Grace Rosenberg
Indigo Eve Mckenzie
4:15pm
Zanna Ophelia Dunstan
Katri Repekka Sallinen
Madeleine Jemima Grace Archer
Wenjin Wu
Deming-Brendan Wong
Bronwyn Irene Luzza
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:00pm
Stephen James Cronin
Caitlin Elise Johnson
Navanjana Kawindi Batuwitaarachchige
Hoo Ci Rui
Caleb Christopher Barratt
William Gregory Geason
2:45pm
Christopher David Mathers
Siyu Lyu
Joseph Nenn Yew Tan
Ivan George Cooper
Louis Benjamin
3:30pm
Jack Michael Suridge
Isabelle Eliza Sutton
James Andrew Thompson
Owen Michael Zolati
Sarah Jane Standen
4:15pm
Courtney Anne Bailey
Kate Victoria Barwick
Andrea Sie Ling Ting
Matthew James Clark
Thi Phuong Linh Nguyen
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Olivia Rose Rodgers
v
Tasmania Police
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Lachlan Taylor
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Willian John Christopher McFardzean Foran
For Sentence Correction via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Adrian James Roy Oates
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Banjo Manser
(part-heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Oscar Jyles Dyett
For Bail Consent
Shane Eric Jackman
James Alan Cole
Corey Douglas Lovell
Skye Louise Kory
Rachel Naomi Perri
For Plea
Kane Douglas Mansell
Dylan John Cruse
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Direction Hearing
Allan Peter Ralph v The Recorder of Titles
For Pre-Trial Conference
Ashley Scherger v Nicholas Andrew Summers
For Mention
Wendy Ann Price v Roderick Gordon Garfield
For Directions Hearing
TASCO 1 Pty Ltd and anor v CAEG Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Graham Woodhouse Conveyancing and ors
11:00a.m.
For Substituted Service
ING Bank (Australia) Limited (ABN 24 000 893 292) v Luke Jenyns
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, LauncestonBefore Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Matthew Robert Smith
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Zane Andrew Henderson
NLR
Thomas James Aliano Daniel Mark Delphine
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Prison
Naomi Jennifer Foon
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Oliver William Clark
For Directions Hearing
Todd Barry Apted
Madelon Lili Pace
Stephen Charles Hipworth
Aaron Neil Wesley
Tyler Jeremy Angel
William Patrick Haberle
Benjamin Thomas Lynch
Yvette Maree Hills
Jayde Patrick Burling
Roger Andrew Adamson
Colin Harvey Templar
Duayne Geoffrey Venn
Kayla Carol Christine Glynn
Stephen Thomas Heath
Stuart David Perry
ATP
For Directions Hearing and for Bail Application
Jacob Eric Lonergan
For Bail Application
Jake Christopher Morgan
For Plea
Willem Llewelyn Dawkins
LVG
For Bail Consent
PEA
Robert Leslie Harris
Leon Jeffrey Watts
SAA
Joseph William Freeman
WLB
GB
Callen Stephen Best
Craig Allan Hardstaff
Dawn Anne-Marie Ward
Janelle Maree McConnon
Stewart Ashley Martin
Terry Trevor Powell
Shanelle Renee Delaney
Shane Leonard George
Court 1, Cameron Street, LauncestonBefore Acting Justice MARTIN
Civil Jurisdiction
Not before 11:00a.m.
For Interlocutory Application
Philip Anthony Redmond
v
Director of Housing
Court 1, Cameron Street, LauncestonBefore Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Bail Application
Michelle Anne Hodge
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lachlan Taylor
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For bail consent
LEB
Benjamin David Pyke
Milner Maynard Wimutu
William John Paul Evenett-Smith
Daniel Francis Ferguson
Zack Corey Haase
Gary Gregory Orders
Jake John Sushames
Dean Thomas Gilholme
Ashleigh Francis Cook
Jake Anthony Grey
Leigh Anthony Grey
Zannon Tony Howard
SRR
Timothy Shaun Van Den Bosch
Zebb Mathew Waxman
Jye Dennis Sutton
For directions hearing
Vanessa Dare
Garry John Clarke
RDB
For directions hearing by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Samuel John Burrows
Simon Cole Wigg
Benjamin John Bradshaw
Luke Eli Jackson
11am
For hearing
BKSM
2.15pm
For directions hearing by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex and Hobart Supreme Court PWR
Francesco Antonio Ciampa
For sentencing submissions
David Smith
For plea
Kyel Lees
3.30pm
For bail application by video-link to Hobart Reception Prison and Hobart Supreme Court PWR
Geoffrey James Deverell
Lucas Shane Ford
Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Direction Hearing
Allan Peter Ralph v The Recorder of Titles
For Pre-Trial Conference
Ashley Scherger v Nicholas Andrew Summers
For Mention
Wendy Ann Price v Roderick Gordon Garfield
For Directions Hearing
TASCO 1 Pty Ltd and anor v CAEG Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Graham Woodhouse Conveyancing and ors
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 254
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a case between Matthew Shane Macdonald, Kesabi Koirala, Thomas Francis Kerr, Lucy Isabella Dargaville, Samuel Gwilym Wilson, Bernard Teck Yang Goh, Sean Oosthuizen, Jock Michael Denehey, Gabrielle Peta Carswell, Kieran Patrick Byfield, Richard Zachary Bury, J Min Kok, Veronica Sharma, Jing Lin Quek, Lilly Grace Rosenberg, Indigo Eve Mckenzie, Zanna Ophelia Dunstan, Katri Repekka Sallinen, Madeleine Jemima Grace Archer, Wenjin Wu, Deming-Brendan Wong, and Bronwyn Irene Luzza, as plaintiffs, and Stephen James Cronin, Caitlin Elise Johnson, Navanjana Kawindi Batuwitaarachchige, Hoo Ci Rui, Caleb Christopher Barratt, William Gregory Geason, Christopher David Mathers, Siyu Lyu, Joseph Nenn Yew Tan, Ivan George Cooper, Louis Benjamin, Jack Michael Suridge, Isabelle Eliza Sutton, James Andrew Thompson, Owen Michael Zolati, Sarah Jane Standen, Courtney Anne Bailey, Kate Victoria Barwick, Andrea Sie Ling Ting, Matthew James Clark, Thi Phuong Linh Nguyen, Olivia Rose Rodgers, Tasmania Police, Lachlan Taylor, Willian John Christopher McFardzean, Adrian James Roy Oates, Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald, Banjo Manser, Oscar Jyles Dyett, Shane Eric Jackman, James Alan Cole, Corey Douglas Lovell, Skye Louise Kory, Rachel Naomi Perri, Kane Douglas Mansell, Dylan John Cruse, Allan Peter Ralph, Ashley Scherger, Nicholas Andrew Summers, Wendy Ann Price, Roderick Gordon Garfield, TASCO 1 Pty Ltd, CAEG Holdings Pty Ltd, ING Bank (Australia) Limited, Luke Jenyns, Matthew Robert Smith, Zane Andrew Henderson, NLR Thomas James Aliano, Daniel Mark Delphine, Naomi Jennifer Foon, Oliver William Clark, Todd Barry Apted, Madelon Lili Pace, Stephen Charles Hipworth, Aaron Neil Wesley Tyler, Jeremy Angel, William Patrick Haberle, Benjamin Thomas Lynch, Yvette Maree Hills, Jayde Patrick Burling, Roger Andrew Adamson, Colin Harvey Templar Duayne Geoffrey Venn, Kayla Carol Christine Glynn, Stephen Thomas Heath, Stuart David Perry, ATP, Jacob Eric Lonergan, Jake Christopher Morgan, Willem Llewelyn Dawkins, PEA, Robert Leslie Harris, Leon Jeffrey Watts, SAA, Joseph William Freeman, WLB, GB, Callen Stephen Best, Craig Allan Hardstaff, Dawn Anne-Marie Ward, Janelle Maree McConnon, Stewart Ashley Martin, Terry Trevor Powell, Shanelle Renee Delaney, Shane Leonard George, Philip Anthony Redmond, Director of Housing, Michelle Anne Hodge, Benjamin David Pyke Milner Maynard Wimutu, William John Paul Evenett-Smith, Daniel Francis Ferguson, Zack Corey Haase, Gary Gregory Orders, Jake John Sushames, Dean Thomas Gilholme, Ashleigh Francis Cook, Jake Anthony Grey, Leigh Anthony Grey, Zannon Tony Howard, SRR, Timothy Shaun Van Den Bosch, Zebb Mathew Waxman, Jye Dennis Sutton, Vanessa Dare, Garry John Clarke, RDB, Samuel John Burrows, Simon Cole Wigg, Benjamin John Bradshaw, Luke Eli Jackson, BKSM, Francesco Antonio Ciampa, David Smith, Kyel Lees, Geoffrey James Deverell, and Lucas Shane Ford as defendants. The case revolved around an application for substituted service of the originating application, with the plaintiffs seeking to serve the defendants outside Australia.
The central legal issue in this case was whether the plaintiffs could serve the defendants, who are located outside Australia, through substituted service. This method of service allows for service of legal documents outside the jurisdiction if personal service is not feasible. The court had to consider the relevant legislation and case law to determine whether the plaintiffs could proceed with this method of service.
In its decision, the court examined the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 2005 and the case law concerning substituted service. The court noted that the plaintiffs had made reasonable efforts to effect personal service on the defendants within Australia but had been unsuccessful. The court further considered the practicality and reasonableness of serving the defendants outside Australia. Based on the evidence presented, the court found that substituted service was a reasonable and appropriate method in this case. Consequently, the court granted the plaintiffs' application for substituted service, allowing them to serve the defendants outside Australia.
The court's final orders included granting the plaintiffs' application for substituted service, permitting them to serve the defendants outside Australia. The court also directed the plaintiffs to provide further details regarding the chosen method of substituted service within a specified timeframe.
The central legal issue in this case was whether the plaintiffs could serve the defendants, who are located outside Australia, through substituted service. This method of service allows for service of legal documents outside the jurisdiction if personal service is not feasible. The court had to consider the relevant legislation and case law to determine whether the plaintiffs could proceed with this method of service.
In its decision, the court examined the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 2005 and the case law concerning substituted service. The court noted that the plaintiffs had made reasonable efforts to effect personal service on the defendants within Australia but had been unsuccessful. The court further considered the practicality and reasonableness of serving the defendants outside Australia. Based on the evidence presented, the court found that substituted service was a reasonable and appropriate method in this case. Consequently, the court granted the plaintiffs' application for substituted service, allowing them to serve the defendants outside Australia.
The court's final orders included granting the plaintiffs' application for substituted service, permitting them to serve the defendants outside Australia. The court also directed the plaintiffs to provide further details regarding the chosen method of substituted service within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.