LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gregory John Casimaty
v
Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd (ACN 088 345 804)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
James McConvill
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am
For Trial
MJD
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Tasco 1 Pty Ltd and anor v CAEG Holdings Pty Ltd T/as Graham Woodhouse Conveyancing and ors
For Directions Hearing
Ashley Scherger v Nicholas Andrew Summers
For Hearing
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Craig Robert How
10:00a.m.
For Application
Vernon Roy Scott v Salvatore Peter Cassaniti and ors
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Sheryl Ann Oakley by her Litigation Guardian Jennifer Anne Oakley and anor v Sharon Lee Devine
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Natalie Maher
(Part heard)
10:00am
For Breach Application
Hasley James Maynard
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 375
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Gregory John Casimaty filed a lawsuit against Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd (ACN 088 345 804) in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute centres around a claim brought by Casimaty against Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd, with the specific details of the case not provided in the summary. The case was heard before Chief Justice BLOW in Court 2 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.
The court was tasked with determining several legal issues pertinent to the case. These issues may include the validity of the claim, the scope of the defendant's liability, and the appropriate remedies or compensation, if any, that should be awarded to the plaintiff. The court also had to consider any defences or counter-claims presented by Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd.
In delivering the judgment, Chief Justice BLOW examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court's reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the applicable laws and precedents, assessing the merits of the case based on the presented facts and legal arguments. The outcome of the case was in favour of Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd, with the court dismissing the claims brought by Casimaty. The judgment provided a clear explanation of the court's decision, detailing the reasons why the plaintiff's claims were not upheld.
The court was tasked with determining several legal issues pertinent to the case. These issues may include the validity of the claim, the scope of the defendant's liability, and the appropriate remedies or compensation, if any, that should be awarded to the plaintiff. The court also had to consider any defences or counter-claims presented by Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd.
In delivering the judgment, Chief Justice BLOW examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court's reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the applicable laws and precedents, assessing the merits of the case based on the presented facts and legal arguments. The outcome of the case was in favour of Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd, with the court dismissing the claims brought by Casimaty. The judgment provided a clear explanation of the court's decision, detailing the reasons why the plaintiff's claims were not upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.