Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 30 October, 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1095


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY 30 OCTOBER, 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review
TT-Line Company Pty Ltd
v
Rae Burrows

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application
Mark Anthony Bell

PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
The Queen
v
Paul James Rischke

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
AMB

10:00am
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges
Geoffrey Bennett-Scrimshaw

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30a.m.
For Sentence
Joshua Scott Webster

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m
For Trial
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee

10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Telephone
Hannah Victoria Paige Strong
Robert Peter Matthewson

For Directions Hearing via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
The Queen
v
Paul James Rischke

For Mention via video link
Mathew Leigh Coates
Cedric Harper Jordan

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link
Noelene June Jordan

For Mention
BJF
Adam John Axton
Luke Frans Bezemer
Kyam Keith Broadby
Zachary Anthony Cooke
Mark Anthony Carr
Colin Harvey Templar
Codie Ken Fazackerley
Timothy Edward Double
Jesse James Martin
Ashton James Whittingham
Ethan Daniel Baker

For Application
Bradley James Jetson

For Plea
Bradley Colin Hay
FRLT

For Bail Consent
Joshua Brian Smith
Daniel Mark Delphine
Cheryl Jane Holton
Toby David Torrents
Naomi Jean Hamill
John David Clinton
Kerrie Anne George
Neil Craig Berne
Stephen James Williams
Mark Richard Nicholas
Russell Peter Haworth
Mark Anthony Carr
JK
Mark Phillip Leslie
Paul Laurence Lowe
RBAY

2:15p.m.
For Application
Damien Neil smart

For Plea
BJF

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Taylor Radford

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 30 October, 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1095
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 1095
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of TT-Line Company Pty Ltd v Rae Burrows was heard before Chief Justice BLOW in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute centres around an allegation of wrongful termination of employment. The plaintiff, TT-Line Company Pty Ltd, seeks to review a decision made by a lower court in favour of the defendant, Rae Burrows, who claims she was unfairly dismissed from her position. The court's role was to assess whether the original decision was legally sound and if the lower court had correctly applied the relevant legal principles.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the lower court had erred in its interpretation of the applicable employment laws and if the evidence presented was sufficient to support the conclusion reached. The court had to consider whether the lower court's findings on the factual matters were open to challenge and whether any procedural errors had occurred that could have influenced the outcome. Additionally, the court examined if the dismissal was justified under the circumstances as presented.

The court concluded that the lower court had correctly applied the law and there were no procedural errors that would warrant a review of the decision. The evidence supported the lower court's findings, and the decision was consistent with the applicable legal principles. The Chief Justice held that the dismissal was justified based on the facts of the case, and the plaintiff's motion to review was dismissed. The court found that the original decision was well-reasoned and adequately supported by the evidence presented.

The final orders of the court were that the motion to review brought by TT-Line Company Pty Ltd was dismissed with costs. The lower court's decision in favour of Rae Burrows was upheld, and the original judgment remains in place.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.