LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 30 JULY 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction11:00a.m.For Further Hearing ZAB
v
JWM
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Melinda Kate Lucas
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ronald Athol Keating
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Director of Housing v Lefevre
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am
For application
Eric William Yabsley
11am
For application
Thomas Dale
v
Alisha Barnes
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
For Bail Consent
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Anthony Ray Loaumtzis
Daniel Robert Knowles
LHC
Jorden Bird
Jye David Cowen
Darren Maxwell Burge
Bayley Wayne Bester
Clinton Anthony Williams
Jack Andrew Cole
Jake Mark Pearce
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Jace Peter Schick
Bryce Robert Richardson
Jenna Maree Black
Skye Louise Kory
Jayden Laurence Croft
11:30a.m.
For Mention
James Stuart Walker
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via TeamsFor Hearing
Maree Matic v Simpson Networks Pty Ltd and ors
For Hearing
Desmond Perce David Jennings v Andrew Paul Bryan McCullagh
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Steele Leslie Ward
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of ZAB v JWM was heard before Justice Wood in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute between the parties, ZAB and JWM, involved a disagreement that required judicial resolution. The court was tasked with determining the legal rights and obligations of the parties involved. The specific details of the dispute remain undisclosed, but it pertained to a matter within the civil jurisdiction of the court.
The legal issues before the court encompassed various aspects of the dispute, including the interpretation of contractual terms, the application of relevant statutes, and the assessment of evidence presented by both parties. The court had to consider the arguments put forth by ZAB and JWM, evaluate the admissibility and weight of the evidence, and apply the appropriate legal principles to reach a decision. The complexities of the case necessitated a thorough examination of the facts and the law to ensure a fair and just outcome.
In delivering the judgment, Justice Wood carefully analysed the evidence and arguments from both parties. The court considered the contractual terms in question, relevant legal precedents, and statutory provisions. After a comprehensive review, Justice Wood determined the legal rights and obligations of ZAB and JWM, providing a detailed rationale for the decision. The judgment concluded with specific findings and orders that addressed the core issues of the dispute, providing clarity and resolution for the parties involved.
The final orders of the court included specific directives for ZAB and JWM, reflecting the court's determination of their respective rights and obligations. The judgment provided a clear and reasoned decision, ensuring that the legal issues were resolved in accordance with the applicable law and principles of justice.
The legal issues before the court encompassed various aspects of the dispute, including the interpretation of contractual terms, the application of relevant statutes, and the assessment of evidence presented by both parties. The court had to consider the arguments put forth by ZAB and JWM, evaluate the admissibility and weight of the evidence, and apply the appropriate legal principles to reach a decision. The complexities of the case necessitated a thorough examination of the facts and the law to ensure a fair and just outcome.
In delivering the judgment, Justice Wood carefully analysed the evidence and arguments from both parties. The court considered the contractual terms in question, relevant legal precedents, and statutory provisions. After a comprehensive review, Justice Wood determined the legal rights and obligations of ZAB and JWM, providing a detailed rationale for the decision. The judgment concluded with specific findings and orders that addressed the core issues of the dispute, providing clarity and resolution for the parties involved.
The final orders of the court included specific directives for ZAB and JWM, reflecting the court's determination of their respective rights and obligations. The judgment provided a clear and reasoned decision, ensuring that the legal issues were resolved in accordance with the applicable law and principles of justice.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.